Windows 10 will reach EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Refresh considered harmful

  • 6 replies
  • 2 have this problem
  • 17 views
  • Last reply by John99

more options

Howdy; I'm a little frustrated at what has become a 3 hour hassle as a result of doing the most dreaded upgrade there is for me - Firefox. I'll try to keep it civil.

One of the things that has consumed a bunch of my time is that I fell into the "refresh" trap. This solved nothing for me - I'm not some Windows user with a bunch of malware who needed to press the equivalent of Firefox's ctl-alt-del; I'm a 50 year old programmer who just confirmed a really weird bug see~J99with this software. What WAS accomplished, however, was an (additional) hour of me fixing (again) all the many things about firefox's default UI settings that I hate (eg, icons cluttering the bookmark toolbar, quitting the browser when I close the last tab, etc, etc). Each one a little (or not-so-little) research task.

Of course all that stuff should be supposedly saved to my "Desktop" - but I don't work that way. I don't have a ~/Desktop folder as I live my life w/a few terminals (often running an editor), a browser that increasingly frustrates me, and the occasional application that I fire up either out of a minimalist menu or straight off a command line. No "~/Desktop" for me, because I don't use the thing - I never even see it as I use 4 virtual desktops, each filled with a window.

So, no ~/Desktop apparently means all my settings went "poof". Or maybe they got saved somewhere. I've fixed most of them now anyway.

Should I have been more careful? Sure. And I paid the price. This post isn't about me though. It's about support and the attitude about it.

When y'all counsel people to take a step that radical - which by the way is a kneejerk "plug it in / turn it on" response that assumes your users are idiots - you really need to put a big old red flag beside it that says "be careful when doing this because it might ruin your day". Like it did mine.

Do I expect this to change? Not really. But now I feel better about wasting 3+ hours on another hellish Firefox upgrade.

Howdy; I'm a little frustrated at what has become a 3 hour hassle as a result of doing the most dreaded upgrade there is for me - Firefox. I'll try to keep it civil. One of the things that has consumed a bunch of my time is that I fell into the "refresh" trap. This solved nothing for me - I'm not some Windows user with a bunch of malware who needed to press the equivalent of Firefox's ctl-alt-del; I'm a 50 year old programmer who just confirmed a really weird bug <sup>[/questions/1079578 see]~J99</sup>with this software. What WAS accomplished, however, was an (additional) hour of me fixing (again) all the many things about firefox's default UI settings that I hate (eg, icons cluttering the bookmark toolbar, quitting the browser when I close the last tab, etc, etc). Each one a little (or not-so-little) research task. Of course all that stuff should be supposedly saved to my "Desktop" - but I don't work that way. I don't have a ~/Desktop folder as I live my life w/a few terminals (often running an editor), a browser that increasingly frustrates me, and the occasional application that I fire up either out of a minimalist menu or straight off a command line. No "~/Desktop" for me, because I don't use the thing - I never even see it as I use 4 virtual desktops, each filled with a window. So, no ~/Desktop apparently means all my settings went "poof". Or maybe they got saved somewhere. I've fixed most of them now anyway. Should I have been more careful? Sure. And I paid the price. This post isn't about me though. It's about support and the attitude about it. When y'all counsel people to take a step that radical - which by the way is a kneejerk "plug it in / turn it on" response that assumes your users are idiots - you really need to put a big old red flag beside it that says "be careful when doing this because it might ruin your day". Like it did mine. Do I expect this to change? Not really. But now I feel better about wasting 3+ hours on another hellish Firefox upgrade.

Modified by John99

Chosen solution

One more thing.

If you're wondering why I'm going thru this exercise, it's simple.

I want there to be something up on this forum that might actually serve as the warning that I didn't get. I got some fine print. I want a warning. Here it is now, right in the post title.

Maybe I saved some other person 30 to 60 minutes.

Thanks.

Read this answer in context 👍 0

All Replies (6)

more options

We do warn users that a refresh will result in lost settings. Both on our website (Refresh Firefox - reset add-ons and settings) and when you click the button in about:support. I'm not sure what else you want, as most end-users find those warnings satisfactory, and a more advanced users, as you say to be, should have had no problem reading the warning

more options

Thanks for the reply.

Let's deconstruct that link that you think is mitigating the potential harm of a Refresh.

First we have a section headed "Refresh Firefox - reset add-ons and settings". I don't read any text there that sounds like a warning. Do you? I didn't and don't care about Extensions, since I have none (just a couple of very common plugins - Flash and Java).

Next we have a section headed "Reset Firefox to its default state". This is merely a step by step cookbook-style recipe for how to do the deed. Nothing that could be construed as a warning, right? And we're through the first two sections of the page. Nothing.

Now we have "What does the reset feature do?" Not only does this not have anything that says "warn" or "caution" or "careful", this REASSURES ME THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE BACKED UP. After describing what the profile folder is (which, being an advance user as I say I am, I already knew about), it tells me extensions will be removed. Remember, I've none, and my plugins, which reside in ./lib64/mozilla/plugins/, won't be touched (I shouldn't be able to mess with them anyway since they're owned by root and I don't believe FF is runing SUID, although I'm not sure).

There are a couple of sentences buried in the text that should have clued me in. Most importantly, here's what I had to notice:

'Your old Firefox profile will be placed on your desktop in a folder named "Old Firefox Data". '

BTW, I could consider that behavior a bug. Right? Why didn't Mozilla do what I consider the obvious thing:

$ cd ~/.mozilla/firefox/ $ mv qpejji6v.default/ qpejji6v $ mkdir afmt36nq.default-1440485757436

... and do its thing in the new 'afmt36nq.default-1440485757436' directory? Why is it making assumptions about my directory structure? The only thing it has control over is '~/.mozilla'. One of the reasons I got rid of ~/Desktop in the first place is the broken assumptions that firefox makes about that directory and its utility for my use case.

So, there isn't anything that we can construe as a "warning". There's some information, buried at the bottom of the page. "What else do I want"? I want something in bold, red, letters, at the top of the page, in an obvious place, that cautions me to think hard before I hit the "Refresh" button.

Thanks.

more options

Chosen Solution

One more thing.

If you're wondering why I'm going thru this exercise, it's simple.

I want there to be something up on this forum that might actually serve as the warning that I didn't get. I got some fine print. I want a warning. Here it is now, right in the post title.

Maybe I saved some other person 30 to 60 minutes.

Thanks.

more options

I do see the need and advantages of the simple refresh. I also see it promoted aggressively and sometime causes problems, although its method has improved over time.

I also marked your last post as the thread solution. Unsolved threads do not show up in Google searches or most users views. I am also cross linking the unresolved "bug" post you mention you confirmed.


P.S. Feel free to at least temporarily unmark the solution if you think Tyler is more likely to reply to an unsolved thread.

Modified by John99

more options

John99 said

I do see the need and advantages of the simple refresh. I also see it promoted aggressively and sometime causes problems, although its method has improved over time...

Hi John; thanks for your reply.

I understand the need for a simple refresh, esp in the many common adware-type cases it applies to (which no doubt flood the forum).

All I'm asking is that there be some prominent red flags associated with its promotion, to help prevent someone like me from blundering into what ended up being a bigger problem.

On further reflection, I do feel that the backup process is a bug; it's not good behavior for FF to make those sort of assumptions about my $HOME directory. It should limit its operations to '~/.mozilla' in this case (obviously if the app is being installed, the install will have to run with higher privileges and put it in /usr/$wherever).

If you wanted to be really smart about it, you'd do that and then, for backwards compatability, drop a soft link in ~/Desktop if that directory exists.

At an ABSOLUTE MINIMUM, when I refresh and the BACKUP FAILS (for any reason), it should LOUDLY WARN ME (ie use way too many caps lol), and ask for a confirm before proceeding. Now that's a real solution that goes beyond my particular problem.

I'll post a bug report to that effect in a few days.

Thanks again.

more options

If you wish to discuss SUMO policy i.e. this forum etc. Including matters relating to general user or Firefox problems it would be better using the contributors forum

I am not certain of the workings of the Firefox Refresh. I usually have multiple (tens of) installs and profiles for Firefox but not at present. IIRC the Refresh only acts on the default profile, but I have not tried testing that recently or looking up the bugs on it.

I have no idea of what Refresh's intended behaviour is when it fails, but would have guessed it just effectively leaves the original profile intact as long as possible, and creates & confirms the backup & new profile before removing the original. Your case seems to indicate that does not happen.

You seem to have a valid point about Refresh making assumptions about existing structures, and apparently it seems losing information when it fails. I know Mozilla is going to say yours is an edge case, but Mozilla is normally very careful about not losing users data, so this is something that should be fixed. Rather late to say so now but it would be a good idea too make manual backups of profiles if you heavily customise them.


P.S. if you do try to look up existing or recent bugs on Refresh here's a couple to start with, note it was previously called Reset.

Modified by John99