Windows 10 will reach EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

This thread was archived. Please ask a new question if you need help.

Large attachments stop sending and require intervention.

  • 1 reply
  • 1 has this problem
  • 9 views
  • Last reply by JohnnyT53

JohnnyT53
JohnnyT53
more options

I call Thunderbird from a program to send out emails in batches. When an attachment exceeds approximately 14 MB, Thunderbird stops sending and requires manual intervention. The messages become stacked in a queue. I then must click the "Write" button for each message. I've modified the config file per a previous suggestion which makes a warning dialog disappear. However, Thunderbird still won't automatically send messages with attachments beyond approximately 14 MB. Is there a way to circumvent this behavior?

I call Thunderbird from a program to send out emails in batches. When an attachment exceeds approximately 14 MB, Thunderbird stops sending and requires manual intervention. The messages become stacked in a queue. I then must click the "Write" button for each message. I've modified the config file per a previous suggestion which makes a warning dialog disappear. However, Thunderbird still won't automatically send messages with attachments beyond approximately 14 MB. Is there a way to circumvent this behavior?

All Replies (1)

JohnnyT53
JohnnyT53 Question owner
more options

Thanks for the reply... Yes, the service provider allows the attachments since when the messages become stacked, (Send windows), I simply click each send window's "Send" button and off the message goes.

I think I will try introducing a larger delay factor between sending messages. Right now I wait 30 seconds between each message. I'm just wondering if I am overwhelming TBird even though each message receives its own thread.

Thanks again...I'll report back