top sites
why limit the numner of top sites? who would want a limit? there is no reason i can think of!
and why do pages? there is enough space for 20+ sites, who would want them paged? why?
and please make them rearrangeable :)
Chosen solution
Hi
We are trying to balance the screen between top sites and collections. We do keep this design under review and hope to improve it further in future updates.
Read this answer in context 👍 2All Replies (5)
Hi
There is space for 16 top sites, you can swipe across to see more.
It is not possible to rearrange them at the moment, but this is something that might be included in a future update.
i know. again: why limit to 16? and why not show them at once without swiping? the first release didnt even have paging, it was added later for no reason...?
Chosen Solution
Hi
We are trying to balance the screen between top sites and collections. We do keep this design under review and hope to improve it further in future updates.
Hi, thanks for the sensible answer! In my opinion one should be able to see all top sites at once.. Hoping for things to go my way ;) And thanks for hearing me
Modified by alex.falkensteiner
I also find the limit, well limiting. I don't use the collections, so i have a lot of spare space that could show the other pinned sites i have on page 2. Why not add an "add/remove row" as an option. Or even the simple facility to manually rearrange the pinned site order? Just a simple tap-hold to drag icons around should be easy to implement. Look at all the wasted space on my new tab page in the attached image (if the image manages to upload).
Modified by mark.c.symons