Hi Michał,
I am probably not the best person to comment on this but my 2 pennies:
First of all a question. Presumably en-US gallery images work ok in all locales with the en-US image name. So if someone localising an article leaves the image markup as it is it works but gives an en-US image.
Secondly it may be a case of swings and roundabouts but I see major advantages in having galleries on a locale level. The obvious main one is that the gallery is specific to that locale and far more convenient to search. The en-US gallery currently showing as 438 pages of images is going to swamp any other locale. Locales will not localise all articles or all images in the articles they do localise.
I am also unsure of the complexity issue. Combining the gallery in to one locale is likely to result in duplications of image names &/or potentially break links - not just the image itself, but the articles the image is used in.
Also locales probably want to take images from other locales in some order of priority, possibly for example the second language of the locale is not English or even a left to right language. Middle East or Eastern locales may be interested in a small number of none-US/European locales.
For Lithium developers it is probably relatively trivial on migration to expose a suitable permalink for each gallery image.
Even having to download and upload an image is easy for a contributor to do. A lot quicker probably that creating the image from scratch: Something a contributor may well not be able to do if it is a different OS or device.
Having a single Gallery with unified naming forces Locales to search in English for the images, and use English image names in their own articles ! that is a backwards step even though localisers are multilingual.
Hi Michał,
I am probably not the best person to comment on this but my 2 pennies:
First of all a question. Presumably en-US gallery images work ok in all locales with the en-US image name. So if someone localising an article leaves the image markup as it is it works but gives an en-US image.
Secondly it may be a case of swings and roundabouts but I see major advantages in having galleries on a locale level. The obvious main one is that the gallery is specific to that locale and far more convenient to search. The en-US gallery currently showing as 438 pages of images is going to swamp any other locale. Locales will not localise all articles or all images in the articles they do localise.
I am also unsure of the complexity issue. Combining the gallery in to one locale is likely to result in duplications of image names &/or potentially break links - not just the image itself, but the articles the image is used in.
Also locales probably want to take images from other locales in some order of priority, possibly for example the second language of the locale is not English or even a left to right language. Middle East or Eastern locales may be interested in a small number of none-US/European locales.
For Lithium developers it is probably relatively trivial on migration to expose a suitable permalink for each gallery image.
Even having to download and upload an image is easy for a contributor to do. A lot quicker probably that creating the image from scratch: Something a contributor may well not be able to do if it is a different OS or device.
Having a single Gallery with unified naming forces Locales to search in English for the images, and use English image names in their own articles ! that is a backwards step even though localisers are multilingual.