Firefox Community Forum

duplicate of /questions/1498770 thread

Recently (around Fx 134) css code for chrome files stopped working. The code I use is set out below. It previously changed the background colour to tan ( #dbc3a3 ), the text colour to dark blue ( #000080 ) and the font size to 17 px. The code found at the following location also no longer works for chrome files : https://gist.github.com/MrOtherGuy/c592f6443dd228022966cbe5715ad5c9

@-moz-document url-prefix("about:"), url-prefix("chrome://"), url-prefix("resource://"){

 :root {
     --in-content-page-color: #000080 !important;
     --in-content-text-color: #000080 !important;
     --in-content-page-background: #dbc3a3 !important;
     --in-content-box-background: #e2cfb6 !important;
     --in-content-deemphasized-text: var(--in-content-text-color) !important;
     scrollbar-color: #6495ed #d9d9d9 !important; 
     --background-color-box: var(--in-content-page-background) !important;
     --text-color: var(--in-content-text-color) !important;      
     color:var(--in-content-text-color) !important;
     --background-color-canvas: var(--in-content-page-background) !important;
     --table-row-background-color-alternate: var(--in-content-box-background) !important;    

 menulist > menupopup{ background-color: var(--in-content-page-background) !important; }}}
 

@-moz-document url-prefix("chrome:") {

 html, body, div, h1, p, table, td, tr { background-color: #dbc3a3 !important;
   color: #000080 !important;
   font-size: 17px !important; }
 tr:hover { background-color: #b3d1ff !important; }
 tr.odd:hover { background-color: #b3d1ff !important; }

}

duplicate of /questions/1498770 thread

Recently (around Fx 134) css code for chrome files stopped working. The code I use is set out below. It previously changed the background colour to tan ( #dbc3a3 ), the text colour to dark blue ( #000080 ) and the font size to 17 px. The code found at the following location also no longer works for chrome files : https://gist.github.com/MrOtherGuy/c592f6443dd228022966cbe5715ad5c9

@-moz-document url-prefix("about:"), url-prefix("chrome://"), url-prefix("resource://"){

 :root {
     --in-content-page-color: #000080 !important;
     --in-content-text-color: #000080 !important;
     --in-content-page-background: #dbc3a3 !important;
     --in-content-box-background: #e2cfb6 !important;
     --in-content-deemphasized-text: var(--in-content-text-color) !important;
     scrollbar-color: #6495ed #d9d9d9 !important; 
     --background-color-box: var(--in-content-page-background) !important;
     --text-color: var(--in-content-text-color) !important;      
     color:var(--in-content-text-color) !important;
     --background-color-canvas: var(--in-content-page-background) !important;
     --table-row-background-color-alternate: var(--in-content-box-background) !important;    

 menulist > menupopup{ background-color: var(--in-content-page-background) !important; }}}
 

@-moz-document url-prefix("chrome:") {

 html, body, div, h1, p, table, td, tr { background-color: #dbc3a3 !important;
   color: #000080 !important;
   font-size: 17px !important; }
 tr:hover { background-color: #b3d1ff !important; }
 tr.odd:hover { background-color: #b3d1ff !important; }

}

I need to combine thoughts on a song into a summary I could use to summarize the emotions in a song and how i me dd of feel the song if I send it could you do that The father knows and accepts that this is the natural progression of life, that his daughter deserves love and happiness with a partner of her own choosing. The lyrics acknowledge this: "And it's gonna be your best day," and he participates in the tradition of walking her down the aisle. This shows his willingness to let go and his hope for her future. However, that lingering doubt, that feeling that no one is quite "good enough," surfaces in subtle ways: • "And it's gonna break my heart when she gives hers to you": This isn't just about the loss of her primary affection; it carries a hint of worry. Will this man truly cherish that precious heart? Will he understand its worth as deeply as her father does? • "She might be your better half / Yeah, but she's my everything": This line highlights the father's unique and irreplaceable perspective. While acknowledging the future husband's importance, he firmly states his own profound connection, almost as a quiet assertion of her inherent value, a value he's known since her birth. • "We'll both love her forever / But I loved her long before": This isn't a competition for love, but it subtly underscores the depth and history of his affection. It's a gentle reminder of his foundational role and a silent question: can this new love truly grasp the entirety of her being as he has witnessed it unfold? • "Buddy, that don't mean she's yours": This repeated line isn't about ownership in a possessive way, but more about the enduring nature of his connection. It's a gentle pushback against the idea that marriage fully transfers his "baby girl" into someone else's complete care. There's an underlying sentiment of "you have a part of her now, but a part of her will always be mine, the little girl I raised." • The overall tone: While there's acceptance, there's also a layer of melancholy and a protective instinct that suggests a slight unease. He's happy for her, but there's a quiet sadness at the shift and a hope that this new man will truly be worthy of the treasure he's receiving. The Emotional Something You're Sensing: You're picking up on the beautiful complexity of this moment. It's not a simple handover; it's a father navigating the joy of his daughter's happiness with the inherent vulnerability of letting her go and trusting someone else with her heart. The "emotional something" is this bittersweet tension – the genuine happiness intertwined with a protective concern and the quiet acknowledgment that his primary role is changing, even if his love isn't. The song beautifully captures this internal struggle. The father isn't being overtly negative about the future husband, but his words are laced with the deep, unwavering love of a father who has cherished his daughter from the very beginning and who carries a natural, perhaps even subconscious, hope that she won't ever be hurt or undervalued. You're spot on in recognizing that layer of "no one will ever be truly good enough" and the lingering doubt. It's a testament to the powerful and unique bond between a father and his daughter. The song doesn't explicitly state the doubt, but it's woven into the emotional fabric of the lyrics through the father's reflections and subtle assertions of his enduring love and connection. bold text

duplicate of /questions/1506417 thread

I have 115 s my current browser version , need to update to your newest version of 137 to be able to connect with websites ... thank you

how do I get Detroit Tigers baseball channel

If you have a legitimate Mozilla question, please submit a question at /questions/new. Thank you.

The article “Is Your Brain Dehydrated?” addresses how dehydration affects brain health and overall well-being. Taylor said that Catherine got sick because of dehydration, which contributes hyperemesis gravid arum. This reflection intends to inform the readers on the significance of hydration, the role of water in the body, along with the causes and symptoms of dehydration.

Well, it's happened. I am using the unbranded build specifically so that I do not have to have signed or verified extensions. But tonight my browser broke anyway because of the expiring CA TLS certs for the add-ons repository.

"One or more installed add-ons cannot be verified and have been disabled [Learn More]". If I click the [Learn More] button nothing happens. It just disappears.

And when I check: "uBlock Origin could not be verified for use in Nightly and has been disabled."

This should not be happening in the unbranded builds. I imagine it is happening in the custom Debian esr too. They're supposed to allow unsigned/unverified extensions/add-ons but now this apparently bug is happening.

To be clear, this was expected for normal Firefox releases with all normal extension signing stuff. But that was explicitly not supposed to be required for the unbranded builds. And so this is a bug.

Find it's resources

According to Hindi & Renniger (2018) assert that taking a criminology courses is a beneficial aspect of schooling. It addresses many technical professionals, and social science curricular. It encourages positive attitudes as it includes a variety of topics such as sociology, psychology, political science, history criminology and philosophy. Furthermore, criminology courses provide students with a deeper understanding of the criminal justice system and the factors that contribute to crime.

Hi. Block Party was just pitched by the WaPo but I see few people here are using it ... yet. Perhaps because you're not monitoring it? I am curious about how it got such a MAJOR free (?) promotion and whether/if there's a way you can or do verify it's claims? For instance, maybe it does what it says it does (clean/close gaps in privacy) but what does it do with the intel it gains?

Is there any chance you can/will verify it in the future?

thanks kindly, steph

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/11/03/online-privacy-settings-block-party/?carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F41ce69d%2F67e57df78492b94b923ec304%2F5d779da19bbc0f0886c7a302%2F42%2F59%2F67e57df78492b94b923ec304