Windows 10 reached EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. If you are on Windows 10, see this article.

Tìm kiếm hỗ trợ

Tránh các lừa đảo về hỗ trợ. Chúng tôi sẽ không bao giờ yêu cầu bạn gọi hoặc nhắn tin đến số điện thoại hoặc chia sẻ thông tin cá nhân. Vui lòng báo cáo hoạt động đáng ngờ bằng cách sử dụng tùy chọn "Báo cáo lạm dụng".

Tìm hiểu thêm

DoH question -- am I understanding this right?

  • 2 trả lời
  • 0 gặp vấn đề này
  • 180 lượt xem
  • Trả lời mới nhất được viết bởi markwarner22

It seems to me that Firefox's DoH implementation is not just pointless but actually harmful. It is security theater. Let me explain:

  • There is no fine-grained control
  • There is no ability for the user to choose what level applies to what networks
  • Default Protection provides no protection when there is a canary domain (trivial)
  • Increased Protection provides no protection when the default provider fails (trivial)
  • Max Protection requires manual intervention when the default provider fails
  • Bonus: it's inconvenient or impossible to use on mobile

For DoH to be useful, the user has to invest effort they could better spend setting up a proper system-level solution.

It seems to me that Firefox's DoH implementation is not just pointless but actually harmful. It is security theater. Let me explain: * There is no fine-grained control * There is no ability for the user to choose what level applies to what networks * Default Protection provides no protection when there is a canary domain (trivial) * Increased Protection provides no protection when the default provider fails (trivial) * Max Protection requires manual intervention when the default provider fails * Bonus: it's inconvenient or impossible to use on mobile For DoH to be useful, the user has to invest effort they could better spend setting up a proper system-level solution.

Tất cả các câu trả lời (2)

When I said "default provider", I meant the provider that is used by default, according to the user's preferences (or according to Mozilla's preferences in the case of Default Protection). Of course, if the user sets a lesser known DoH provider, some of the issues are less significant. It mainly applies to the major DoH providers.