Windows 10 reached EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. If you are on Windows 10, see this article.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More
This thread was archived. Please ask a new question if you need help.
Solved Archived

about:config Query String/Specific Parameter

Firefox Settings
b9z7kmdn replied
b9z7kmdn
b9z7kmdn

Is there any way to open the about:config page to a specific setting? I frequently toggle a particular setting on and off and would like a quick way to bookmark it for easy access.

I'm thinking something along the lines of: about:config?setting=media.peerconnection.enabled

Even better would be to allow a new value to be passed in as well: about:config?setting=media.peerconnection.enabled&value=true

Is there any way to open the about:config page to a specific setting? I frequently toggle a particular setting on and off and would like a quick way to bookmark it for easy access. I'm thinking something along the lines of: about:config?setting=media.peerconnection.enabled Even better would be to allow a new value to be passed in as well: about:config?setting=media.peerconnection.enabled&value=true

All Replies (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Top 25 Contributor
  • Moderator

Chosen Solution

That is no longer possible. In the past before the change to the aboutconfig.html page there was support for a ?filter=xx parameter, but they didn't include this in the new design. There is support for a regular expression if you include an asterisk (*) in the search query.

You can possibly use the Browser Console to toggle/modify a specific pref. You can recall code you the past, so it isn't that much work. 

var pn = "media.peerconnection.enabled";
var cv = Services.prefs.getBoolPref(pn);
Services.prefs.setBoolPref(pn, cv == false ? true : false);
console.log(pn, Services.prefs.getBoolPref(pn));

b9z7kmdn
b9z7kmdn Question owner

Thanks for the reply! That's not what I was hoping for, but it's a workable solution