Windows 10 reached EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

Поиск в поддержке

Избегайте мошенников, выдающих себя за службу поддержки. Мы никогда не попросим вас позвонить, отправить текстовое сообщение или поделиться личной информацией. Сообщайте о подозрительной активности, используя функцию «Пожаловаться».

Подробнее

filing mails into folders. Tunderbird. Bug 2000453

  • 2 ответа
  • 0 имеют эту проблему
  • 12 просмотров
  • Последний ответ от Seiberjimmy

дополнительные действия

1 How can the list "recent folders" in the icon "store in" be sorted alphabetically? (sorry, my version of Thunderbird speaks German) It used to be alphabetically, but now is sorted chronologically.

2 I cordially suggest to add a function exactly like this one, but with item at my own disposal (maybe the favorite folders).

Thanks, Martin

1 How can the list "recent folders" in the icon "store in" be sorted alphabetically? (sorry, my version of Thunderbird speaks German) It used to be alphabetically, but now is sorted chronologically. 2 I cordially suggest to add a function exactly like this one, but with item at my own disposal (maybe the favorite folders). Thanks, Martin

Изменено Matt

Все ответы (2)

дополнительные действия

Some users prefer "most recently used topmost", others prefer "alphabetical".... Look up these bug reports: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829748 Move/Copy to > Recent: Target folder list should be sorted by most recently used topmost, not alphabetical https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000453 Move/Copy to > Recent: Target folder list is more difficult to use after Bug #1829748 which changed the list to most recently used topmost, not alphabetical

You also may write a new bug report (enhancement request) explaining your preferences.

дополнительные действия

Thank your very much! I have added a comment to the second report. Actually this is not a bug, it is that the cries the loudest, gets his message through. I'd prefer a customisable list of quick-links resp. favourites.

Whether chronological oder alphabethical is useful, is a quesion of length. Short list -> find folders easily, even if they change positions several times a day. Long list: searching folders is painful, if they change positions contoinuously. I vote for: a) an option to customise the length of the list, I'd prefer more than 25 entries b) an option to sort the list either chronologically od alphabethically (I defintitely perfer alhabethically) I consider it rather useless having a double-list, that also doubles the time to search for a folder If I may make a wish, I would like to have a **list of favourites **instead (that is, what most other software offers), where folders used just once do not enter.

Задать вопрос

Для ответа на сообщения вы должны войти в свою учётную запись. Пожалуйста, задайте новый вопрос, если у вас ещё нет учётной записи.