X
Tap here to go to the mobile version of the site.

Support Forum

Fingerprinting protection doesn't work in FF67, try https://amiunique.org

Posted

Firefox 67 is suppose to block fingerprinting when activated in the security/privacy settings. Well, try this french site : https://amiunique.org and see what can be read from your system and browser. I'm wondering how can it be possible to block fingerprinting other than giving false/random/generic data and be like everyone, not unique...

Firefox 67 is suppose to block fingerprinting when activated in the security/privacy settings. Well, try this french site : https://amiunique.org and see what can be read from your system and browser. I'm wondering how can it be possible to block fingerprinting other than giving false/random/generic data and be like everyone, not unique...

Chosen solution

It depends on what is giving you away as "unique". In the details for "My fingerprint" you can identify what gives you a low "Similarity ratio" and then obfuscate those variables. These may have side-effects. For example, both my content language and my timezone have a SR < 0.1% — I could change these, but these may have undesirable side-effects I'm not prepared to tolerate.

Read this answer in context 0
Quote

Additional System Details

Installed Plug-ins

  • Shockwave Flash 32.0 r0

Application

  • User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/67.0

More Information

oneofthedamons 2 solutions 10 answers

Chosen Solution

It depends on what is giving you away as "unique". In the details for "My fingerprint" you can identify what gives you a low "Similarity ratio" and then obfuscate those variables. These may have side-effects. For example, both my content language and my timezone have a SR < 0.1% — I could change these, but these may have undesirable side-effects I'm not prepared to tolerate.

It depends on what is giving you away as "unique". In the details for "My fingerprint" you can identify what gives you a low "Similarity ratio" and then obfuscate those variables. These may have side-effects. For example, both my content language and my timezone have a SR < 0.1% — I could change these, but these may have undesirable side-effects I'm not prepared to tolerate.
Was this helpful to you?
Quote

Question owner

That's what I thought, you can't avoid fingerprinting :-( without side-effects. How then does the fingerprint protection work in FF67? Mozilla shouldn't give users a false sense of protection if the efficiency is too low...

That's what I thought, you can't avoid fingerprinting :-( without side-effects. How then does the fingerprint protection work in FF67? Mozilla shouldn't give users a false sense of protection if the efficiency is too low...
Was this helpful to you?
Quote
oneofthedamons 2 solutions 10 answers

According to [this post] the fingerprinting protection looks to be based on a server blacklist rather than analysing server behaviour:

"How will Firefox block these harmful scripts?

To combat these threats, we are pleased to announce new protections against fingerprinters and cryptominers. In collaboration with Disconnect, we have compiled lists of domains that serve fingerprinting and cryptomining scripts…"

(I must admit, I'm surprised at this, I thought it was based on server behaviour too.)

According to [[https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/04/09/protections-against-fingerprinting-and-cryptocurrency-mining-available-in-firefox-nightly-and-beta/ this post]] the fingerprinting protection looks to be based on a server blacklist rather than analysing server behaviour: "'''How will Firefox block these harmful scripts?''' To combat these threats, we are pleased to announce new protections against fingerprinters and cryptominers. In collaboration with Disconnect, we have compiled lists of domains that serve fingerprinting and cryptomining scripts…" (I must admit, I'm surprised at this, I thought it was based on server behaviour too.)

Modified by oneofthedamons

Was this helpful to you?
Quote

Question owner

[...] the fingerprinting protection looks to be based on a server blacklist rather than analysing server behaviour[...]

Ah, I see... It's indeed a good start and it answers my question. But Mozilla should warn it's users that the protection is partial.

This post should be marked with SOLVED.

Thank you!

<blockquote>[...] the fingerprinting protection looks to be based on a server blacklist rather than analysing server behaviour[...] </blockquote> Ah, I see... It's indeed a good start and it answers my question. But Mozilla should warn it's users that the protection is partial. This post should be marked with SOLVED. Thank you!
Was this helpful to you?
Quote
Ask a question

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.