Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Why is Enigmail not compatible with Firefox 27.0.1 ? Can't install on Thunderbird

  • 4 ŋuɖoɖowo
  • 1 masɔmasɔ sia le esi
  • 2 views
  • Nuɖoɖo mlɔetɔ foss69llc

more options

When I attempt to install Enigmail I receive a message that it is not compatible with Firefox 27.0.1. This is incompatibility is a problem that I would think I would not encounter ?!!

When I attempt to install Enigmail I receive a message that it is not compatible with Firefox 27.0.1. This is incompatibility is a problem that I would think I would not encounter ?!!

Ŋuɖoɖo si wotia

I was appoint to reply that I already tried this, but realized there was a step I had not taken before. So, letting you know success.

Thanks!

Xle ŋuɖoɖo sia le goya me 👍 0

All Replies (4)

more options

hello foss69llc, while you're in thunderbird, go to the menu > addons, search for "enigmail" and install it this way...

more options

Ɖɔɖɔɖo si wotia

I was appoint to reply that I already tried this, but realized there was a step I had not taken before. So, letting you know success.

Thanks!

more options

You got this error because the Extension is not compatible with well Firefox. Were you expecting Firefox to some how send the file to your Thunderbird install and install it there?

Either save the .xpi file to disk and install it in Thunderbird as per the How to install in Thunderbird instructions that popup when you click on Download Now button OR find it in the Addons manager search and install it that way as suggested above.

I think there is or was a Firefox extension that made it so the online hosted extensions would then install in Thunderbird and not Firefox.

more options

I was actually following instructions provided on the site for Thunderbird, as well as Securityinabox, so would suggest the instructions at both sites misled. But solved now thanks to Philip's original reply, plus a bit of intuition on my part.

Thanks, though, for your suggestion. Just think that much of our earlier digital tech was more transparent and easier to use and modify.