• Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Firefox ESR 128 --remote-debugging-port CLI option with BiDi

Until recently the Firefox docs described how to use the CDP-based Remote Agent at [this url](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html), now defunct.… (saznaj više)

Until recently the Firefox docs described how to use the CDP-based Remote Agent at [this url](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html), now defunct. Here is the latest archive version I can find from the end of last year: https://web.archive.org/web/20241126214503/https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html

One usage example looked like this:

% firefox --remote-debugging-port DevTools listening on ws://localhost:9222/devtools/browser/7b4e84a4-597f-4839-ac6d-c9e86d16fb83

I have tried the same but get no websocket address returned:- ``` % firefox-esr Mozilla Firefox 128.11.0esr ``` ``` % firefox-esr -h ... ... --remote-debugging-port [<port>] Start the Firefox Remote Agent,

                    which is a low-level remote debugging interface used for WebDriver
                    BiDi and CDP. Defaults to port 9222.

... ... ```

`% firefox-esr --remote-debugging-port` command exits with nothing returned

I have `remote.active-protocols` set to 3 in my Firefox prefs.

Please advise how I get the Remote Agent to return a websocket address for use with BiDi with FF 128. My OS is Debian-based Linux.

TIA

Pitanje od keymaster prije 8 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od Henrik (work) prije 8 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Issues with aus3.mozilla.org and aus4.mozilla.org

I am a DNS administator at my employers and notice that on my employers network that aus3.mozilla.org and aus4.mozilla.org seem to be returning NXDOMAIN both with our on … (saznaj više)

I am a DNS administator at my employers and notice that on my employers network that aus3.mozilla.org and aus4.mozilla.org seem to be returning NXDOMAIN both with our on prem DNS and via the public dns providers when a browser attempts update it can fail.

Have other Australian users reported such behavior and are these hosts still valid


DIG


grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 aus3.mozilla.org

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 aus3.mozilla.org
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 40382
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
aus3.mozilla.org. IN A
AUTHORITY SECTION:

mozilla.org. 2 IN SOA infoblox1.private.mdc1.mozilla.com. hostmaster.mozilla.com. 2024020614 180 180 1209600 60

Query time: 0 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:04:52 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 126

grudd@crayon:~$ dig stun.services.mozilla.com

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> stun.services.mozilla.com
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 56679
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1280
QUESTION SECTION:
stun.services.mozilla.com. IN A
AUTHORITY SECTION:

services.mozilla.com. 836 IN SOA ns-679.awsdns-20.net. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400

Query time: 0 msec
SERVER: 10.67.10.62#53(10.67.10.62) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:13:11 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 138

grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 stun.services.mozilla.com

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 stun.services.mozilla.com
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 62337
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
stun.services.mozilla.com. IN A
AUTHORITY SECTION:

services.mozilla.com. 127 IN SOA ns-679.awsdns-20.net. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400

Query time: 0 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:13:19 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 135

grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 aus4.mozilla.org

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 aus4.mozilla.org
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 15261
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
aus4.mozilla.org. IN A
AUTHORITY SECTION:

mozilla.org. 40 IN SOA infoblox1.private.mdc1.mozilla.com. hostmaster.mozilla.com. 2024020614 180 180 1209600 60

Query time: 4 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:24:30 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 126

grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 aus4.mozilla.org

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 aus4.mozilla.org
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 26928
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
aus4.mozilla.org. IN A
AUTHORITY SECTION:

mozilla.org. 35 IN SOA infoblox1.private.mdc1.mozilla.com. hostmaster.mozilla.com. 2024020614 180 180 1209600 60

Query time: 0 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:24:32 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 126

grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 aus5.mozilla.org

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 aus5.mozilla.org
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37023
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
aus5.mozilla.org. IN A
ANSWER SECTION:

aus5.mozilla.org. 48 IN CNAME balrog-aus5.r53-2.services.mozilla.com. balrog-aus5.r53-2.services.mozilla.com. 58 IN CNAME prod.balrog.prod.cloudops.mozgcp.net. prod.balrog.prod.cloudops.mozgcp.net. 984 IN A 35.244.181.201

Query time: 4 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:24:43 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 163

grudd@crayon:~$ dig @8.8.8.8 aus5.mozilla.org SOA

<<>> DiG 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.20.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> @8.8.8.8 aus5.mozilla.org SOA
(1 server found)
global options: +cmd
Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65395
flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
QUESTION SECTION:
aus5.mozilla.org. IN SOA
ANSWER SECTION:

aus5.mozilla.org. 42 IN CNAME balrog-aus5.r53-2.services.mozilla.com. balrog-aus5.r53-2.services.mozilla.com. 52 IN CNAME prod.balrog.prod.cloudops.mozgcp.net.

AUTHORITY SECTION:

balrog.prod.cloudops.mozgcp.net. 300 IN SOA ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com. cloud-dns-hostmaster.google.com. 1 21600 3600 259200 300

Query time: 108 msec
SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
WHEN: Mon Jun 02 10:24:49 AEST 2025
MSG SIZE rcvd: 237

grudd@crayon:~$

Pitanje od gr4638au prije 8 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 8 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Firefox ESR Not Displaying 'Refresh Firefox' Option in Help > More Troubleshooting Information

I'm using Firefox ESR 128.10.1esr on Kali, and I'm encountering an issue where the 'Refresh Firefox' option is missing from the ☰ → Help → Troubleshooting more Informatio… (saznaj više)

I'm using Firefox ESR 128.10.1esr on Kali, and I'm encountering an issue where the 'Refresh Firefox' option is missing from the ☰ → Help → Troubleshooting more Information. This is preventing me from restoring Firefox to its default settings. I've already tried the following:

   Restarting Firefox
   Clearing the startup cache
   Confirmed there are no extensions installed

None of these steps have fixed the issue. I need a way to reset Firefox ESR to factory defaults, but I can't find an option to do so. Attached is a screenshot of the Troubleshooting Information page.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

Pitanje od jadi zadi prije 8 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 8 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

32 to 64bit ESR Migration

Hello, We are trying to automate updating Firefox ESR from 32bit to 64bit. There seems to be an issue with getting user's profiles to properly migrate for ESR. If we do … (saznaj više)

Hello,

We are trying to automate updating Firefox ESR from 32bit to 64bit. There seems to be an issue with getting user's profiles to properly migrate for ESR. If we do a plain 32bit uninstall and 64bit installation, a new "default-esr-1" profile gets created (which is expected behavior from these Mozilla docs for new installs). But, when we set the MOZ_LEGACY_PROFILES=1 policy, this reverts to using the "default" profile instead of "default-esr" profile that was previously in use.

Are there any known ways around this which does not require user intervention to manually change back to the "default-esr" profile?

Thank you

Pitanje od Brian prije 10 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od Brian prije 8 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

ExtensionSettings policy

We're exploring adopting a default deny policy for Firefox extensions in our enterprise. However when I tested this by creating a custom policies.json Firefox unexpectedl… (saznaj više)

We're exploring adopting a default deny policy for Firefox extensions in our enterprise. However when I tested this by creating a custom policies.json Firefox unexpectedly removed all extensions for me, including the ones I thought I had allow listed. Here is my policies.json but just keeping in the Facebook Container add-on to illustrate:

{

   "policies": {
       "ExtensionSettings": {
           "*": {
               "blocked_install_message": "Only approved Firefox extensions can be installed, please email your request to itdept@example.org",
               "installation_mode": "blocked",
               "allowed_types": ["theme", "dictionary", "locale"]
           },
           "@contain-facebook.xpi": { "installation_mode": "allowed" }
       }
   }

}

What I would like is to to allow pre-approved extensions (including if they already are installed) and all other types of add-on, but remove and prohibit installation of unapproved extensions.

Can anyone assist, please?

Pitanje od Damon prije 8 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od Mike Kaply prije 8 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Enterprice policies not updating eventhough the plist file has changed.

In /Library/Preferences/org.mozilla.firefox.plist: ``` <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>EnterprisePoliciesEnabled</key> <true /> &… (saznaj više)

In /Library/Preferences/org.mozilla.firefox.plist:

``` <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>EnterprisePoliciesEnabled</key> <true /> <key>ExtensionSettings</key> <dict> <key>cloudmetering@snowsoftware.com</key> <dict> <key>install_url</key> <string>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SnowSoftware/agent-firefox-extension/refs/heads/main/cloudmetering-v1.2.3.xpi</string> <key>installation_mode</key> <string>force_installed</string> </dict> </dict> </dict> </plist>```

In about:policies: {"cloudmetering@snowsoftware.com":{"installation_mode":"blocked","install_url":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SnowSoftware/agent-firefox-extension/refs/heads/main/cloudmetering-v1.2.3.xpi"}}

The plist file did read "blocked" at one point, but it no longer does. Why isn't firefox picking up the new value from the plist file? Restarting/refresing FF has not helped so far.

Pitanje od Per Malmberg prije 9 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od Per Malmberg prije 8 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

April 29th update to firefox ESR has broken viewing streams on twitch.tv

I confirmed this problem on two separate computers(windows 7 and windows 11) and version 115.23.0 of Firefox ESR can not properly play streams on twitch.tv Audio will pl… (saznaj više)

I confirmed this problem on two separate computers(windows 7 and windows 11) and version 115.23.0 of Firefox ESR can not properly play streams on twitch.tv

Audio will play, but the video does not load with only a black screen with question mark icon replacing video feed.

Pitanje od explode337 prije 9 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 8 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Intune Joined Devices on Firefox

Hello, Our organization is attempting to implement a Conditional Access policy that restricts access to certain websites to Intune joined devices only. The error message… (saznaj više)

Hello,

Our organization is attempting to implement a Conditional Access policy that restricts access to certain websites to Intune joined devices only. The error message mentions that I need to enable a setting from within Firefox called Windows SSO, mentioned here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/windows-sso. This setting is already enabled and I am still getting an error.

Is there anything else that could be causing this?

Pitanje od tallen3 prije 9 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od nullsbrawlone prije 9 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Firefox 128.0 ESR

Добрый день Есть ли возможность установить плагин .xpi в mozilla через cmd. AltLinux. Конечно я уже прочел статьи существующие. Не сработали рекомендации. Можно ли сдела… (saznaj više)

Добрый день Есть ли возможность установить плагин .xpi в mozilla через cmd. AltLinux. Конечно я уже прочел статьи существующие. Не сработали рекомендации. Можно ли сделать вывод что Firefox 128.0 ESR не поддерживает установку плагинов через cmd? Если да, то можем ли мы сослаться на официальный ответ firefox ? Благодарю за рекомендации.

Pitanje od DeathNote.14 prije 9 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 9 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Policies.Json Can't Block A Website

Trying to block www.share365.net but it's not working { "policies": { "WebsiteFilter": { "Block": [ "*:share365.net", "*:www.share3… (saznaj više)

Trying to block www.share365.net but it's not working

{

 "policies": {
     "WebsiteFilter": {
         "Block": [
           "*:share365.net",
           "*:www.share365.net",
           "*://share365.net/*"
         ]
     }
 }

}

Pitanje od aassccvv prije 1 godinu

Odgovoreno od Mike Kaply prije 1 godinu

  • Arhivirano

How to override top-sites.json from omni.ja in ESR ?

I am going to deploy Firefox ESR in an environment where the default topsites provided by the top-sites.json included in omni.ja (namely Wikipedia, youtube and reddit) ar… (saznaj više)

I am going to deploy Firefox ESR in an environment where the default topsites provided by the top-sites.json included in omni.ja (namely Wikipedia, youtube and reddit) are not desirable, and I want to provide my own. I cannot find a way to do so.

Setting the browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.default.sites preference through the policies.json file does not work (the pref gets loaded but it does not influence the actual default topsites, which is not surprising since the default value of this pref has nothing to do with the actual default topsites).

Note that I am not seeking to remove the topsites from the homepage entirely (as would be achieved through the FirefoxHome/TopSites policy), I want to change the default ones.

I tried creating my own top-sites.json in /lib/firefox-esr/browser/ where omni.ja resides, but to no avail.

Pitanje od ysalmon prije 10 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 10 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Problems with automatic import of HTML bookmarks

Hi, we use Firefox 128.9.0esr (64bit) on about 6000 workstations. We redirect the stored bookmarks on a personal network drive for each user. For that we use these settin… (saznaj više)

Hi, we use Firefox 128.9.0esr (64bit) on about 6000 workstations. We redirect the stored bookmarks on a personal network drive for each user. For that we use these settings via Windows group policy:

browser.bookmarks.file = P:\Firefox\Bookmarks browser.bookmarks.autoExportHTML = true browser.places.importBookmarksHTML = true

For some time the automatic export/import with that settings above does not work any more. When I close Firefox on workstation A, the bookmarks seem to be exported correctly in that export-file (check the file via editor). But when I use another workstation B an start Firefox, the exported file does not import on startup. But this worked fine in the past.

I found out, that the switch "browser.places.importBookmarksHTML" is obviously automtically set to false when I have startet Firefox (checking with about:config). I dont know if it is correct.

Any suggestions? Maybe it's a new bug?

Thanks Malte

Pitanje od Malte prije 10 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 10 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Camera block settings managed by MDM is not working

I am trying to manage Firefox browser for our users with MDM. On doing so, I can't able to get expected output on blocking the camera access for certain websites with the… (saznaj više)

I am trying to manage Firefox browser for our users with MDM. On doing so, I can't able to get expected output on blocking the camera access for certain websites with the following OMA-URI.

./Device/Vendor/MSFT/Policy/Config/Firefox~Policy~firefox~Permissions~Camera/Camera_Block

I can add websites in allow section and even lock the setting so that the users can't change. But facing issues with blocking camera access.

Is there any place where I can see the log if there are any error encountering by any chance? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

Pitanje od Laurel prije 10 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 10 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Intune CSP - UserMessaging Firefox Labs

We have Firefox deployed and managed through Intune/Endpoint and all works well but every device has an error with this line of the policy: UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs [./… (saznaj više)

We have Firefox deployed and managed through Intune/Endpoint and all works well but every device has an error with this line of the policy:

UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs [./Device/Vendor/MSFT/Policy/Config/Firefox~Policy~firefox~UserMessaging/UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs] STATE Error SOURCE PROFILES Source Profile Mozilla_Firefox_Configuration ERROR CODE 0x87d1fde8

The error code is the same on all devices and is the only one present in on each device config.

Does anyone have any idea what the issue and resolution would be?

Thanks, Matt

Pitanje od inter-milano prije 11 mjeseci

Odgovoreno od Mike Kaply prije 10 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Certificate problem accessing an internal company website

I am trying to reach an internal company website ([URL]), with a certificate chain rooted in a company certificate authority. This works fine in Chrome, and worked in Fir… (saznaj više)

I am trying to reach an internal company website ([URL]), with a certificate chain rooted in a company certificate authority. This works fine in Chrome, and worked in Firefox on my previous computer. But i recently got a new machine, and something somewhere is not quite right. I get an error message looking like this (between the ~~~s):

~~~ Someone could be trying to impersonate the site and you should not continue.

Web sites prove their identity via certificates. Firefox does not trust [URL] because its certificate issuer is unknown, the certificate is self-signed, or the server is not sending the correct intermediate certificates.

Error code: SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER

View Certificate ~~~

If i click on the error code, i get these details:

~~~ [URL]

Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognised.

HTTP Strict Transport Security: false HTTP Public Key Pinning: false

Certificate chain:


BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----

[certificate]


END CERTIFICATE-----
BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----

[certificate]


END CERTIFICATE-----
BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----

[certificate]


END CERTIFICATE-----

~~~

If i click 'View Certificate', i get a chain of three certificates:

  1. Subject common name = [certificate]
  2. Subject common name = [certificate]
  3. Subject common name = [certificate]

If i go to Settings > Privacy & Security > View Certificates > Authorities, i can find both the [certificate] certificates. As far as i can tell, they are identical - i can open the certificate from 'View Certificate' and the corresponding one from the certificate manager and flip between tabs, and all the details are the same.

I am using Firefox 120.0, via a flatpak, on Ubuntu 22. I have given the flatpak access to /etc/ssl/certs, where my company's internal CA certificates are located.

To me, this seems like it should all work. The server has a certificate signed by an internal CA, which is signed by another internal CA, and both those internal CA certificates are in my certificate manager. So what is going wrong? Is there any way i can debug this?

Pitanje od twic prije 2 godine

Odgovoreno od Mike Kaply prije 2 godine

  • Arhivirano

firefox update

Hi, I keep getting a message that I should update to a newer version of Firefox on Ubuntu. The problem is: I click on the install for 64 bit button, A ...tar.xz file down… (saznaj više)

Hi, I keep getting a message that I should update to a newer version of Firefox on Ubuntu. The problem is: I click on the install for 64 bit button, A ...tar.xz file downloads to my desktop, and the process ends completely. How to proceed?

Thanks, Ildikó

Pitanje od Ildikó Sexty prije 11 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od James prije 10 mjeseci

  • Arhivirano

Installing Firefox ESR in Enterprise Enviroments

Hello everyone, We have been using Mozilla Firefox ESR (32-bit) in the organization for several years. For installation on our clients, we use "Matrix42 Empirum" as the … (saznaj više)

Hello everyone,

We have been using Mozilla Firefox ESR (32-bit) in the organization for several years. For installation on our clients, we use "Matrix42 Empirum" as the software distribution tool. All it does is install the MSI of Firefox.

However, for quite some time now (almost 2 years), we have been facing an issue where some installations are marked as successful (Error code 0), but once the MSI installer is automatically closed, files like "firefox.exe" disappear from the installation directory – despite the installation being marked as successful.

The problem doesn’t always occur, but a repair attempt usually resolves the issue.

In addition to Empirum, we also use Defender for Endpoint, but we couldn’t find any clues there.

Is this problem known, or are we the only ones experiencing it?

Pitanje od WilliCat prije 11 mjeseci

Zadnji odgovor od Mike Kaply prije 10 mjeseci