Mozilla VPN is currently experiencing an outage. Our team is actively working to resolve the issue. Please check the status page for real-time updates. Thank you for your patience.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

This thread was archived. Əgər kömək lazımdırsa lütfən yeni sual verin.

firefox does not show font-awesome unicode codes in html select option but it does for paragraphs or in other html elements

  • 2 cavab
  • 1 has this problem
  • 6 views
  • Last reply by TyDraniu

hadesunseenn
hadesunseenn
more options

I have checked that firefox is able to fetch font files. If I add a unicode character in <p> tag then it shows but it does not work in <option></option> , but it does in chrome or other browsers.

I have checked that firefox is able to fetch font files. If I add a unicode character in &lt;p> tag then it shows but it does not work in &lt;option&gt;&lt;/option&gt; , but it does in chrome or other browsers.

Modified by cor-el

All Replies (2)

hadesunseenn
hadesunseenn Question owner
more options

u can try this in your local file please 


  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/3.2.1/css/font-awesome.min.css">
  <style type="text/css">
   select, select option {
     font-family: 'FontAwesome';
 }
  </style>
</head>
<body style="font-family: 'FontAwesome';">
<select name="allSort">
 <option value="price-up">Price Low to High &#xf175;</option>
 <option value="price-down">Price High to Low &#xf176;</option>
 <option value="name-down">Name A to Z &#xf175;</option>
 <option value="name-up">Name Z to A &#xf176;</option>
</select>

<p>&#xf175;</p>

Modified by cor-el

TyDraniu
TyDraniu
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Yes, there are a lot of issues with <select> element.

They're tracked in this meta: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1154677

I'm not sure if yours is already mentioned, you could create a new bug and attach it to the list in 1154677.