Pesquisar no apoio

Evite burlas no apoio. Nunca iremos solicitar que telefone ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone ou que partilhe informações pessoais. Por favor, reporte atividades suspeitas utilizando a opção "Reportar abuso".

Learn More

strange root certs in device manager

  • 3 respostas
  • 3 têm este problema
  • 1 visualização
  • Última resposta por firefly0

more options

When I opened the device manager (preferences -> advanced -> certificates -> security devices) I was surprised to find the following entry under "Root Certs":

path /home/<user name>/.mozilla/firefox/<profile name>/libnssckbi.so

The corresponding file does not exist at this location (the correct location is /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nss/libnssckbi.so).

I'm wondering how this entry originated, and whether it should be deleted? It is dated Nov 2012. A fresh profile does not have any root certs in the device manager.

When I opened the device manager (preferences -> advanced -> certificates -> security devices) I was surprised to find the following entry under "Root Certs": path /home/<user name>/.mozilla/firefox/<profile name>/libnssckbi.so The corresponding file does not exist at this location (the correct location is /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nss/libnssckbi.so). I'm wondering how this entry originated, and whether it should be deleted? It is dated Nov 2012. A fresh profile does not have any root certs in the device manager.

Todas as respostas (3)

more options

I've called the big guys to help you. Good luck.

more options

The correct location of the libnssckbi.so file would be the Firefox installation directory and not the Firefox profile folder (~/.mozilla/firefox/).

more options

cor-el said

The correct location of the libnssckbi.so file would be the Firefox installation directory and not the Firefox profile folder (~/.mozilla/firefox/).

Indeed. I have never set this preference manually, so I'm wondering what the preferences->advanced->certificates->security_devices->Root_Certs preference does, and whether setting it to a strange value could compromise security?