Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

How can I get latest Thunderbird/Ubuntu to work with Frontier.com pop3,smtp & SSL?

  • 3 respostas
  • 2 have this problem
  • 5 views
  • Last reply by Matt

more options

When I try to set up Thunderbird for my email I can not get the advanced setup to accept SSL with pop3.frontier.com port 110 and smtp.frontier.com port 25. It will accept None instead of SSL but I want the security. Pop3 port 995 and SMTP either port 587 or 465 refuse to be accepted by Thunderbird. I have contacted Frontier tech support and they claim pop3/110, smtp/25 combination should work with SSL. They tried a 3 way call but your phone line was swamped. I really like Thunderbird and abhor Frontier's YahooMail. Thank you for your assistance.

When I try to set up Thunderbird for my email I can not get the advanced setup to accept SSL with pop3.frontier.com port 110 and smtp.frontier.com port 25. It will accept None instead of SSL but I want the security. Pop3 port 995 and SMTP either port 587 or 465 refuse to be accepted by Thunderbird. I have contacted Frontier tech support and they claim pop3/110, smtp/25 combination should work with SSL. They tried a 3 way call but your phone line was swamped. I really like Thunderbird and abhor Frontier's YahooMail. Thank you for your assistance.

Chosen solution

Frontier have failed to implement the changes to SLL that came about as a result of evidence that SSL was broken. As a result they only offer broken SSL.

Thunderbird no longer accepts this broken SSL and has not done for some 12 months. It is interesting that the community lead mail project with no employees can implement changed security but the paid company can not. But they have not.

SO if you want me to tell you how to make Thunderbird's SSL work in a broken state I will. But you are more secure using NONE and being aware your provider is failing in their obligation to make regular security updates as the broken security only offers a false sense of security.

Ler a resposta no contexto 👍 1

All Replies (3)

more options

Chosen Solution

Frontier have failed to implement the changes to SLL that came about as a result of evidence that SSL was broken. As a result they only offer broken SSL.

Thunderbird no longer accepts this broken SSL and has not done for some 12 months. It is interesting that the community lead mail project with no employees can implement changed security but the paid company can not. But they have not.

SO if you want me to tell you how to make Thunderbird's SSL work in a broken state I will. But you are more secure using NONE and being aware your provider is failing in their obligation to make regular security updates as the broken security only offers a false sense of security.

more options

for 10 years I was not well satisfied with Comcast but then a little over a year ago I moved and have been stuck with Frontier. I'm in the boonies. After a couple 3 weeks I wanted my Comcast back. I just love mega companies that care more about their bottom line than their customers.

Thank you for your insight. I guess I'll just have to make do.

more options

Mark112 said

for 10 years I was not well satisfied with Comcast but then a little over a year ago I moved and have been stuck with Frontier. I'm in the boonies. After a couple 3 weeks I wanted my Comcast back. I just love mega companies that care more about their bottom line than their customers. Thank you for your insight. I guess I'll just have to make do.

I would suggest minimizing the use of your ISP mail and using one of the free providers. They all do a good line in SSL/TLS and despite the high profile hacks really do offer fairly good security.

Personally I am drawn to GMX because of it's German style privacy policies. but Google is also good. I am seeing worrying vendor lockin trends coming form Apple, Yahoo and Hotmail/Live/Outlook, so am somewhat loath to recommend them. At this point the venerable and quirky AOL is a better bet I think than those three.