Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Learn More

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

sec_error_bad_signature vs. sec_error_untrusted_issuer

  • 2 antwurd
  • 256 hawwe dit probleem
  • 2 werjeftes
  • Lêste antwurd fan SCGR

more options

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception.

Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception. Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

Alle antwurden (2)

more options

the same, want to know reason and solution. thanks.

more options

What worked for me was to use a self-signed certificate, instead of using a certificate that was signed by some other self-signed certificate.