Avatar for Username

Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Learn More

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

Firefox ESR 91.12

  • 9 antwurd
  • 0 hawwe dit probleem
  • 30 werjeftes
  • Lêste antwurd fan Mike Kaply

mriley1
mriley1
more options

Hello, Qualys is detecting Vulnerabilites on our Firefox ESR 91.12 Versions which were patched by MFSA2022-29.

It is showing Vulnerabilities because MFSA2022-30 lists CVE's for ESR 102.X and we are on 91.12.

Is there anywhere I can go to get a list of all Vulnerabilities on 91.X to show our Security team, I believe CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in 91.12 because they are not listed in https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-29/ but need evidence

Thank You,

Hello, Qualys is detecting Vulnerabilites on our Firefox ESR 91.12 Versions which were patched by MFSA2022-29. It is showing Vulnerabilities because MFSA2022-30 lists CVE's for ESR 102.X and we are on 91.12. Is there anywhere I can go to get a list of all Vulnerabilities on 91.X to show our Security team, I believe CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in 91.12 because they are not listed in https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-29/ but need evidence Thank You,

Keazen oplossing

CVE-2022-36314 was not fixed in Firefox 91 ESR.

See:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773894#c25

ESR was not affected by CVE-2022-2505.

Dit antwurd yn kontekst lêze 👍 0

Alle antwurden (9)

jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I can't speak for Qualys, but it looks like there is a 91.13.0esr out today. Maybe that will help?

mriley1
mriley1 Fraacheigener
more options

Thank you for the Reply. This doesn't help though. Is CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 present in ESR 91.12.

jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

As you have seen, there is no indication in the Mozilla security alerts that Firefox 91.x is affected by the local .lnk issue. The bug report linked in the alert typically is confidential. Maybe someone who reads this thread is authorized to read it (I am not).

mriley1
mriley1 Fraacheigener
more options

Thank you for the information on the local .lnk issue. Is there anyway to get someone who has authority to reply regarding this?

James
James
  • Top 25 Contributor
  • Moderator
more options

Btw the Fx 91.13.0 ESR Released today is the last main update for the old Fx 91.0 ESR channel as when Fx 105.0 is Released there will only be the Fx 102.3 ESR for a supported ESR version.

mriley1
mriley1 Fraacheigener
more options

Thank you for the information, we did update to 91.13 and will work with the owner of the server to get ESR updated to 102.3 next month. In the meantime, I need to prove CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in ESR 91.12, can someone please respond with the answer to the question.

Thank You,

Mike Kaply
Mike Kaply
  • Top 25 Contributor
  • Moderator
more options

Keazen oplossing

CVE-2022-36314 was not fixed in Firefox 91 ESR.

See:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773894#c25

ESR was not affected by CVE-2022-2505.

mriley1
mriley1 Fraacheigener
more options

Thank you Mike! So CVE-2022-36314 is present in ESR 91.12?

Mike Kaply
Mike Kaply
  • Top 25 Contributor
  • Moderator
more options

> Thank you Mike! So CVE-2022-36314 is present in ESR 91.12?

It was both complex and not a high severity issue and 102 ESR can be used.