Curious about the name convention change from Spam to Junk in TB 141. I can't change it back -- I actually prefer "Spam", but I'll "adjust" to "Junk" if I have to. Was… (xle nububuwo)
Curious about the name convention change from Spam to Junk in TB 141. I can't change it back -- I actually prefer "Spam", but I'll "adjust" to "Junk" if I have to. Was this a political thing (ie: the "spam" brand name)?
I have a filter for a particularly frequent spam FROM: address. The filter is set to act when anything in the FROM contains the spam address "onmicrosoft.com". When it lo… (xle nububuwo)
I have a filter for a particularly frequent spam FROM: address. The filter is set to act when anything in the FROM contains the spam address "onmicrosoft.com". When it locates such, the filter marks the message read, and then moves the message to TRASH on my main account. The problem is, I think, that these messages are caught by my server-side spam filter and it moves the messages to the Spam folder. And the filter can't see them there I guess. A lot of what gets marked spam by the server is wrong, and I want those in the spam filter so I can go on the server and mark them NOT SPAM. So I want these I know are spam to go to the trash, and I'll just delete them unread. Is there a way to point the filters at the spam folder and not just the inbox?
Over the last month or so I've been been getting a lot of junk which is timestamped with future dates - like 2066 for example. Presumably this is done to promote the mess… (xle nububuwo)
Over the last month or so I've been been getting a lot of junk which is timestamped with future dates - like 2066 for example. Presumably this is done to promote the message to the 'front' of my inbox. Unfortunately there are now so many of these that I risk overlooking more important mail. Is there any way of filtering out 'impossible' dates I wonder? Any help would be gratefully received! Robin.
