搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

Worth switching to maildir in my case?

  • 2 个回答
  • 0 人有此问题
  • 58 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 clul

more options

Hi,

After years using TB version 60 due to a discontinued extension, I wanna try 102 now. Is the maildir storage format still experimental? In particular, I'd like to know:

1. Performance: Which format tends to perform better when a folder goes beyond, say, three thousand messages? 2. Disk activity: Is there any risk of maildir reducing my SSD lifetime, considering that it writes more to disk? I don't receive many messages a day, normally less than a hundred. 3. Disk space: Does maildir takes much more space than MBox, considering that each file takes 4k disk space no matter its size (at least on NTFS)?

Thanks much, Cleverson

Hi, After years using TB version 60 due to a discontinued extension, I wanna try 102 now. Is the maildir storage format still experimental? In particular, I'd like to know: 1. Performance: Which format tends to perform better when a folder goes beyond, say, three thousand messages? 2. Disk activity: Is there any risk of maildir reducing my SSD lifetime, considering that it writes more to disk? I don't receive many messages a day, normally less than a hundred. 3. Disk space: Does maildir takes much more space than MBox, considering that each file takes 4k disk space no matter its size (at least on NTFS)? Thanks much, Cleverson

被采纳的解决方案

I would not recommend maildir. I use it for a google IMAP account and it is generally functional, but I would not place anything of real value there as yet.

I have no idea, as Thunderbird is driven by it's internal index, I don;t think there is going to be much difference on an SSD with regard to speed. For MBOX the index is an offset in a file, for maildir is is a file. In both cases the file has to be opened that a set amount of data read (about the same as both have an upper limit of the actual message size).

Maildir has some appealing features, like removing the need for compacting, making backups smaller and removing the ability of antivirus to get bogged down on multi Gigbyte file. But that really is about it. That is partially why a plugable storage format, which mailDir implements is desired but not being driven hard. THere are some benefits, but nothing critical at this time.

定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (2)

more options

选择的解决方案

I would not recommend maildir. I use it for a google IMAP account and it is generally functional, but I would not place anything of real value there as yet.

I have no idea, as Thunderbird is driven by it's internal index, I don;t think there is going to be much difference on an SSD with regard to speed. For MBOX the index is an offset in a file, for maildir is is a file. In both cases the file has to be opened that a set amount of data read (about the same as both have an upper limit of the actual message size).

Maildir has some appealing features, like removing the need for compacting, making backups smaller and removing the ability of antivirus to get bogged down on multi Gigbyte file. But that really is about it. That is partially why a plugable storage format, which mailDir implements is desired but not being driven hard. THere are some benefits, but nothing critical at this time.

more options

Thanks much, so I'll stick to MBox for now.