搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

"The Big Lie" & I Don't Mean Politics

  • 3 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 12 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 TyDraniu

more options

Mozilla has no true feedback page any more, so I chose to post here. I kept the "Allow Firefox to install and run studies" box unchecked since I began to use the Firefox browser (years ago). While I was researching a different issue, I found other users' posts about app.normandy. They all said that it allowed Mozilla to do what Mozilla promised not to do: run studies in violation of users' preference to opt out. Based on what I learned from those posts, I found where app.normandy was in my computer's about:config and toggled it to false. I want to thank those other users for their posts. Mozilla's explanation, also according to those posts, is that "Normandy is a collection of servers, workflows, and Firefox components that enables Mozilla to remote control Firefox clients in the wild based on precise criteria." Aside from whether or not Mozilla should be remote-controlling clients in this way, does it really consider all the diverse places in the world where its users live to be "in the wild?"

Mozilla has no true feedback page any more, so I chose to post here. I kept the "Allow Firefox to install and run studies" box unchecked since I began to use the Firefox browser (years ago). While I was researching a different issue, I found other users' posts about app.normandy. They all said that it allowed Mozilla to do what Mozilla promised not to do: run studies in violation of users' preference to opt out. Based on what I learned from those posts, I found where app.normandy was in my computer's about:config and toggled it to false. I want to thank those other users for their posts. Mozilla's explanation, also according to those posts, is that "Normandy is a collection of servers, workflows, and Firefox components that enables Mozilla to remote control Firefox clients in the wild based on precise criteria." Aside from whether or not Mozilla should be remote-controlling clients in this way, does it really consider all the diverse places in the world where its users live to be "in the wild?"

所有回复 (3)

more options

Normandy distributes both studies and hotfixes. If you disabled studies, you shouldn't have received any studies. Did you find studies listed on the about:studies page?

more options

I can't see what I can't see. A post about printing problems, which writers attributed to app.normandy and not just to an issue with an update, led me to find app.normandy in about:config. (I had the same printing problem and was able to reverse the update change.) Some app.normandy preferences in about.config refer to shield studies. It looks as though even if the study participation preference is unchecked on the user's preferences page, Firefox could still run shield studies unless the about:config shield studies opt-out preference is also set to true. I think, based on the other writers' posts, that the shield studies might not appear on users' about:studies pages. If the purpose of app.normandy is to quickly send hotfixes, why didn't Mozilla name it something that users could understand, such as "app.hotfixes?" And what does Mozilla mean by referring to all the diverse places where Firefox users live and work as "in the wild?"

more options

1&Done said

I think, based on the other writers' posts, that the shield studies might not appear on users' about:studies pages.

All studies (experiments) appear on about:studies. If Allow Firefox to install and run studies is turned off, you don't receive any studies.