Baproduit Nionso Community Forum

I am using Firefox on iPhone (together with DuckDuckGo as my preferred search engine) and I want to configure it in the most secure and reliable way, without running into blocked pages or limited results.

Here’s what I would like step-by-step help with: 1. HTTPS-Only Mode – how to enable this permanently so all sites load securely. 2. Tracking Protection – which level is best for privacy without breaking websites (Standard vs Strict). 3. DuckDuckGo Setup – how to make it my default search engine in Firefox iOS. 4. SafeSearch – how to set it to the best option (Strict, Moderate, or Off) depending on my preference. 5. General Security – any other recommended settings (cookies, history, etc.) to improve private browsing.

My goals are: • Reliable browsing without “HTTP not allowed” errors. • Strong privacy protection. • Smooth experience without unnecessary restrictions.

Could you please guide me step by step on how to set this up correctly?

Thank you in advance for your support!

From: [ or ] To: "Conrad Szablewski" <etcetcetc73@earthlink.net> Subject: [ DuckDuckGo Privacy Weekly ] For Aug 28, 2025 Date: Aug 28, 2025 8:43 AM

DuckDuckGo Privacy Weekly

   DuckDuckGo Privacy Features: The Fire Button [duckduckgo.com]
   Ever wish you could wipe the slate clean online? Our Fire Button burns away traces of websites that you’ve visited (like cookies and website caches), browsing session information (like open tabs and URL history), and permissions you’ve granted to websites (like geolocation, camera, and microphone settings).

Yahho search is on my home screen but not on my app list. I suspect malware. I use Bitdefender free for antivirus and scans sho no problem. I read that yahoo search can be hacked.What can I do

I signed up & paid for Mozilla Monitoring Premium. I get monthly reports from then, but when I click on "automatically delete data from brokers," I'm asked to sign up for Premium again. Please help.

I have just swapped to a new Android phone and when I try to search using my Firefox app, it comes up with Google. Is this right? Also, even though I have Firefox as my default browser on my laptop, when I open a link in email, it comes up on a Microsoft Edge page?

How do I set private browsing as default on android device? Prior suggestions only work on laptop. Nothing here suggests setting as default, I've gone through all the options.

Microsoft Outlook Client emails are legally valid in a court of law, but Thunderbird emails are not. Can we start taking baby steps towards making Thunderbird emails a little more viable in legal applications?

While I do not understand these things in the depth required, can we start taking baby steps towards achieving legal validity of emails downloaded from Thunderbird?

I am presenting below a conversation that I had with chat GPT regarding this matter for the help of anyone who wishes to take this up.

Chat GPT:

QUESTION 1: 1. As per my limited knowledge, Outlook client emails are legally valid because the header cannot be edited. This however, is not true of Thunderbird emails. Do I understand correctly? 2. What are the challenges in making Thunderbird header not user editable, so that Thunderbird emails also have the same benefit?

Chat GPT: Your question touches on email authenticity and legal validity—especially in regulated or evidence-sensitive contexts. Let's break it down:

Is it true that Outlook headers are immutable and Thunderbird’s are not?

Partially True — but needs clarification.

Email headers in both Outlook and Thunderbird

Can be viewed by recipients, but cannot be edited after the email has been sent. Only during composition can certain headers (like `From`, `Reply-To`) be changed, depending on the setup.

What you cannot change post-sending:

After an email is sent (from any client), the core SMTP headers (`Date`, `From`, `Message-ID`, etc.) are locked. These are generated by the sending server and cryptographically traceable via server logs or DKIM.

Outlook’s extra layer:

Outlook integrates closely with Microsoft Exchange, which stores server-side logs, message tracking, and non-editable audit trails (e.g., via journaling). That’s what gives Outlook/Exchange emails more evidentiary credibility, not just the client itself. In contrast, Thunderbird usually connects via standard IMAP/SMTP, without server-side logging, unless used with a corporate mail server like Postfix + Dovecot + journaling.

In Summary: Table Feature Outlook (w/ Exchange) Thunderbird Headers editable during composition Yes (some fields) Yes (same) Headers editable after sending No No Built-in server-side logging Yes (Exchange) No (unless configured) Strong evidentiary trail Common in enterprise Requires external setup

What are the challenges in making Thunderbird headers non-editable during composition?

The challenge lies not in technical impossibility, but in the design philosophy of Thunderbird:

a. Open Source & User Control

Thunderbird is open source, so users can customize or even extend the client to manipulate headers (via extensions or config changes). This is powerful for advanced users, but not ideal in regulated or high-trust environments.

b. Lack of Server-Side Enforcement

Thunderbird relies on whatever SMTP/IMAP servers it connects to. Unless the server enforces policies (like DKIM signing, DMARC, or header filtering), client settings are only soft limits.

c. Missing Native Audit Features

Outlook/Exchange logs metadata like when a message was sent, delivered, read, etc. Thunderbird lacks that unless paired with enterprise-grade backends. How Could Thunderbird Improve Legal Trustworthiness?

1. Header Locking During Composition

  	Disable or grey out fields like `From`, `Date`, `Message-ID`.
  	Possible via extension, but not enforced by default.

2. Enforced Server-Side Signing (e.g., DKIM)

  	Ensure outgoing mail is cryptographically signed to verify integrity.
  	Requires a properly configured mail server, not just Thunderbird.

3. Journaling or BCC Archiving

  	Auto-BCC all sent mail to a tamper-proof archival system.
  	Thunderbird can do this via rules or server configuration.

4. Extension or Mode for “Forensic Compliance”

  	Custom Thunderbird modes that restrict editing headers, disable extensions, log actions, etc.

Final Thoughts

You're correct in understanding that Thunderbird offers less baked-in legal reliability than Outlook + Exchange. But this isn’t due to insecure design—rather, it's due to Thunderbird’s flexibility and lack of tight server integration. Thunderbird can be made trustworthy with the right server configuration (DKIM, archiving) and possibly some custom add-ons.

If you’re looking to build or propose a “forensic-grade” Thunderbird environment, I can help design one with proper technical constraints and audit trails. Let me know!

QUESTION 2: My legal Counsel has told me that emails downloaded from the Gmail server into the outlook client are legally valid. So even without Microsoft Exchange and all the other server side logging, Outlook emails are legally viable. Chat GPT

Yes — your legal counsel is broadly correct, and here’s the nuanced explanation:

Emails Downloaded via Outlook (from Gmail) Can Be Legally Valid

Even without Microsoft Exchange, emails downloaded into Outlook (say via IMAP or POP from Gmail) can still be legally viable evidence, because:

1. Outlook stores email in a tamper-evident format

Outlook saves emails in `.pst` or `.ost` files. These files have a structured, proprietary binary format that is hard to tamper with without detection. Courts often accept these files (with chain of custody) as original records.

2. Outlook preserves server headers

Even when connected to Gmail, Outlook does not modify or fake headers. It shows server-signed headers (like `Message-ID`, `Date`, etc.) exactly as received. These headers can be verified independently against:

Gmail’s “Show Original” → raw headers DKIM/DMARC authentication

3. Integrity from Gmail itself

Gmail assigns unique `Message-ID`s and signs outgoing mail with DKIM. DKIM proves the message has not been tampered with since it left Google’s servers. So even if Outlook is the client, the source of trust is Gmail + DKIM, not just the software.

In Legal Contexts

4. What courts typically require is:

 A copy of the original message as received (headers intact)
 Some form of chain of custody (who had access, how was it stored)
 Optionally, confirmation from the mail server logs (if challenged)
 Outlook is often used in corporate/legal environments because:

It does not let users easily forge full headers The data format is harder to manipulate Legal teams and forensic experts are familiar with `.pst` files

So even without Exchange, emails received and stored in Outlook are trusted, provided:

The full headers are intact The `.pst` or `.ost` file has not been tampered with

5. How This Differs from Thunderbird

Thunderbird also preserves headers and stores messages locally — but: Table: Aspect Outlook Thunderbird Storage format `.pst`/`.ost` (proprietary) `.mbox` or plain text Header immutability Enforced by format Editable via text file (with effort) Forensic familiarity High (in legal circles) Moderate Tamper-evidence Strong (binary format) Weak (editable with text editors)

So Thunderbird messages can technically be altered more easily after download, especially if stored in `.mbox` or `.eml` formats. That’s why they are viewed with more caution in legal settings.

Conclusion

Yes — emails downloaded into Outlook, even from Gmail, are generally accepted as legally valid, provided the headers are intact and the file has not been manipulated. Outlook's storage format and market reputation contribute to its legal trustworthiness — even without Exchange.

If you want to achieve similar legal credibility with Thunderbird, the focus should be on:

Enforcing DKIM-signing (from Gmail, already done) Locking down `.eml` or `.mbox` file access Possibly archiving in tamper-evident formats

Let me know if you’d like a workflow to export Thunderbird emails into a legally robust format similar to `.pst`.

Stolen laptop .Thunderbird had saved all my accounts passwords . I had no master password. Accounts were synced with my desktop .Now I installed Primary Password and, changed all my accounts passwords . Can the thief still access my accounts on stolen laptop. I backed up my profiles. Can messages on laptop be deleted . If I delete all messages from my desktop, will all messages also be deleted from stolen laptop if thief access thunderbird

I'm trying to send an OpenPGP-encrypted email from a Linux Mint machine using msmtp, relaying through the smtp server, to another Linux machine, to myself, running Thunderbird (with the sender's (my) imported private key already loaded and working in Thunderbird).

The encrypted test message is composed manually as a file (email.eml) and sent using msmtp from the command line. The email successfully passes through the SMTP relay, is received and decrypted by Thunderbird (so the OpenPGP decryption part works that much I know ... ), but the plain text content is not rendered properly and the email is displayed blank, no plain text as expected. Thunderbird has decrypted the message, but it’s not being displayed or rendered.

This makes me think the issue lies in the structure or MIME headers/parts of the .eml file itself — specifically how the encrypted message body is wrapped. This is not something I'm entirely familiar with, and even less so with what Thunderbird expects for a PGP encrypted message...

I suspect the issue is due to incorrect MIME formatting or missing headers (Content-Type, Content-Transfer-Encoding, Charset, or boundaries etc.) needed for Thunderbird to correctly render the decrypted body into plain text once it receives it. Since I’m assembling the .eml manually (and eventually by a script whej I get to it), I may be overlooking certain structural requirements that typical mail clients (say Thunderbird or similar) or gpg front-ends (like mutt, mailx ...) would handle automatically.

My questions are: Is there a correct MIME structure or format expected by Thunderbird for OpenPGP-encrypted emails ? Is this documented anywhere specifically for Thunderbird ? Or, are there publicly available examples or specs that describe how such an email should be structured (e.g., RFCs or working .eml templates)?

Is there a known way to validate or "lint" .eml files for OpenPGP compatibility ? That would be nice ;-)

As I said the internals or MIME formatting is not my thing usually. Any pointers to Th.B. documentation, sample files, or tools that help with .eml structure validation would be grately appreciated.

Thanks in advance, cheers MM