Windows 10 will reach EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Differences between implementation of :has between FF and Chrome.

more options

FF bug (?) (my own tests), Chrome works as expected, was also gemini ai discussed.:

 Why for the following css rule (new FF):
 header:has(~ noscript) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {width: calc(var(--number-of-slides) * 100%);}
 the --number-of-slides is defined and visible:
 header:has(~ noscript) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {--number-of-slides: 1}
 but this one isn't at all:
 header:has(~ noscript:has([value="1"])) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {--number-of-slides: 1}
 And all remembering that in the noscript there is direct descendant having value="1"

As mentioned it works as expected (so average person naturally may think it sould) well for Chrome - noscript is visible, js disabled, controls are visible. Sophisticated use case of :has() but it sort of "has right" to happen.

FF bug (?) (my own tests), Chrome works as expected, was also gemini ai discussed.: Why for the following css rule (new FF): header:has(~ noscript) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {width: calc(var(--number-of-slides) * 100%);} the --number-of-slides is defined and visible: header:has(~ noscript) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {--number-of-slides: 1} but this one isn't at all: header:has(~ noscript:has([value="1"])) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {--number-of-slides: 1} And all remembering that in the noscript there is direct descendant having value="1" As mentioned it works as expected (so average person naturally may think it sould) well for Chrome - noscript is visible, js disabled, controls are visible. Sophisticated use case of :has() but it sort of "has right" to happen.

All Replies (5)

more options

Do you have a minified testcase of this issue? Then it's better to report it on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org. Thanks!

more options

Thx, sure. Bugzilla will be better for that. testcase... hope one day i know what it is ... :) After i efficiently report it, good to remove the topic probably.

more options

It is not well reported as i have no time to go deeply how bugzilla works: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000585

Please remove this post here.

more options

Excuse me i may be wrong in that it works for chrome - it seemed to do. Need time to verify.

more options

Reposting what i wrote in bugzilla (please remove this entire topic)

I WAS WRONG CREATING THIS REPORT PLEASE REMOVE IT: Gemini told me (the reason it gave is what i suppose is the problem): the "CSS rule div:has(span:has(u)) is not allowed according to the current CSS specification. The has() pseudo-class has a specific restriction: :has() cannot be nested within another :has().

This restriction is in place to prevent performance issues and potential "cyclic querying" within the browser's rendering engine, which could make style calculations infinitely complex"

As i am new to :has() it needs eperience to come up with proper css rule at times so based on the original supposed-to-be "bug" the following: header:has(~ noscript:has([value="1"])) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] can be replaced by: header:has(~ noscript > [value="1"]) ~ * div[class*="-slider"] {--number-of-slides: 1; width: 50%;} and works as expected everywhere.

Cuir ceist

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.