Windows 10 will reach EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

Avatar for Username

Prohledat stránky podpory

Vyhněte se podvodům. Za účelem poskytnutí podpory vás nikdy nežádáme, abyste zavolali nebo poslali SMS na nějaké telefonní číslo nebo abyste sdělili své osobní údaje. Jakékoliv podezřelé chování nám prosím nahlaste pomocí odkazu „Nahlásit zneužití“.

Zjistit více

Toto vlákno bylo archivováno. Pokud potřebujete pomoci, založte prosím nový dotaz.

old data in large archive folders should not be indexed unless needed

  • Žádné odpovědi
  • 1 má tento problém
  • 1 zobrazení
DTD
DTD
more options

When a new account is created thunderbird indexes all the folders. I have several archive folders with 20+ email. There is no reason to index this data unless forced to by the user opening or searching the folder. On my PC this takes 25%+ of the CPU. I did not measure bandwidth.

Shutting thunderbird down seems to stop the indexing. Better would be to index the "current" data. IOS email does this as does claws-mail.

I'm running FreeBSD 11.2 on CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6300HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz (2304.11-MHz K8-class CPU). As I am a system/network admin, no great strain for me. For a geologist, etc would/could be an issue. Anyway it's always more efficient to do nothing

When a new account is created thunderbird indexes all the folders. I have several archive folders with 20+ email. There is no reason to index this data unless forced to by the user opening or searching the folder. On my PC this takes 25%+ of the CPU. I did not measure bandwidth. Shutting thunderbird down seems to stop the indexing. Better would be to index the "current" data. IOS email does this as does claws-mail. I'm running FreeBSD 11.2 on CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6300HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz (2304.11-MHz K8-class CPU). As I am a system/network admin, no great strain for me. For a geologist, etc would/could be an issue. Anyway it's always more efficient to do nothing