Windows 10 reached EOS (end of support) on October 14, 2025. For more information, see this article.

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

话题已关闭并存档。 如果需要帮助请提出新问题。

How to automatically block Canvas?

  • 4 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 227 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 SuMo Bot

更多选项

Some of the Support-Members here already know im using privacy.resistFingerprinting - true. Now, each time im visiting a website im being asked to block or allow fingerprinting. How can i set this so it will always auto-block canvas?

-see attached screenshot

Some of the Support-Members here already know im using privacy.resistFingerprinting - true. Now, each time im visiting a website im being asked to block or allow fingerprinting. How can i set this so it will always auto-block canvas? -see attached screenshot

被采纳的解决方案

Canvasblocker is more advanced than firefox's inbuilt protection, with domrect protection, audio api protection, and more on top of canvas protection. It also has settings which can change how it protects you, as opposed to Firefox's binary option. Full list of tests is at the canvasblocker test page.

It is correct that privacy.resistFingerprinting is ok, I have experienced graphical issues with canvas apps when it is on. It also can make your fingerprint not change in the way that Canvasblocker allows you to do.

You do not notice when Firefox blocks it normally, it only asks when a user interaction happens with the canvas.

定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (5)

更多选项

Hello,

When it comes to preventing canvas-based fingerprinting, Firefox does well, but causes websites to break. I suggest Canvasblocker, an addon that randomizes outputs and protects many javascript apis, including newer sound based attacks. To use Canvasblocker effectively, privacy.resistFingerprinting should be set to false, as it interferes.

更多选项

andmagdo said

Hello, When it comes to preventing canvas-based fingerprinting, Firefox does well, but causes websites to break. I suggest Canvasblocker, an addon that randomizes outputs and protects many javascript apis, including newer sound based attacks. To use Canvasblocker effectively, privacy.resistFingerprinting should be set to false, as it interferes.

So you recommend Canvasblocker over privacy.resistFingerprinting. This one? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/canvasblocker/ I read the description, they say it's ok to have privacy.resistFingerprinting true.

But i dont understand, why would this addon be better as the built-in option from firefox? Also, that means there is no way to auto-block canvas? firefox always asks me about it, instead of by default just blocking it, that's wired.

更多选项

选择的解决方案

Canvasblocker is more advanced than firefox's inbuilt protection, with domrect protection, audio api protection, and more on top of canvas protection. It also has settings which can change how it protects you, as opposed to Firefox's binary option. Full list of tests is at the canvasblocker test page.

It is correct that privacy.resistFingerprinting is ok, I have experienced graphical issues with canvas apps when it is on. It also can make your fingerprint not change in the way that Canvasblocker allows you to do.

You do not notice when Firefox blocks it normally, it only asks when a user interaction happens with the canvas.

更多选项

andmagdo said

Canvasblocker is more advanced than firefox's inbuilt protection, with domrect protection, audio api protection, and more on top of canvas protection. It also has settings which can change how it protects you, as opposed to Firefox's binary option. Full list of tests is at the canvasblocker test page. It is correct that privacy.resistFingerprinting is ok, I have experienced graphical issues with canvas apps when it is on. It also can make your fingerprint not change in the way that Canvasblocker allows you to do. You do not notice when Firefox blocks it normally, it only asks when a user interaction happens with the canvas.

Thank you again, will install canvas blocker and disable built in resist fingerprinting.

更多选项

This question has been locked because the original author has deleted their account. While you can no longer post new replies, the existing content remains available for reference.