تمام مصنوعات Community Forum

Hello there, we are using blue prism version 7.1.1 & having couple of live processes running on Mozilla FireFox which are started failing from today morning, as we browsed on the internet and found that some root certificate upgrade happened at Firefox end which made Blue Prism extension disabled. kindly can you check and help with some interim solution to avoid impact on business.

Regards

We are experiencing a certificate error. Under linux I get a message at the top of my screen telling me of the error and asking me if I want to override. That message does not show up under windows 11. Because the message does not show up we can not override. The problem is temporary but I need to get to the server as soon as possible. Please help.

Dave

Dear Team,

When my Client device installs From Firefox 102.7.0 ESR to Firefox 128.7.0 from SCCM. (The case is First install the Version 102.7.0 then save the Bookmarks and then uninstall. Second Install the 128.7.0 then check the bookmarks)

user profile Bookmarks are not mapped in Firefox. When I check C:\Users\Tests\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles I can see the xxxx.defaultesr

I don't understand why the bookmarks are not linked in Firefox. Can you please help? I would be thankful to you if you could share me the .bat script

Thank you

Hi! I'm having trouble with Firefox while shopping on Scottish Kilt Co., a store for custom kilts and Scottish accessories. The website is slow to load, and some images aren’t displaying properly. Is there something in my browser settings I need to adjust for a smoother shopping experience?

I’ve already cleared my cache and updated Firefox, but the problem persists. Any tips on improving performance or troubleshooting would be appreciated!

Thanks!

When receiving signed but not encrypted messages, thunderbird complains with "invalid digital signature" and "technical error deteced". Unpacking the message and checking with gpg manualy verifies the signature correctly. Messages encrypted and signed are verified correctly. When looking at the logs in the console, I can see:

openpgp: Parsed contentTypeLine: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------95ynGFLP1eI6rMalg5HH0Iop" mimeVerify.sys.mjs:133:14 openpgp: Decrypting message: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- ..[snipped]

decryption.sys.mjs:143:14 openpgp: Nothing to decrypt/verify. decryption.sys.mjs:176:16 openpgp: Decrypting message: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- ..[snipped]

decryption.sys.mjs:143:14 openpgp: Nothing to decrypt/verify. decryption.sys.mjs:176:16 openpgp: Parsed contentTypeLine: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------95ynGFLP1eI6rMalg5HH0Iop" mimeVerify.sys.mjs:133:14 openpgp: Found signed MIME message; micalg=pgp-sha256 mimeVerify.sys.mjs:148:16 openpgp: Parsed contentTypeLine: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------95ynGFLP1eI6rMalg5HH0Iop" mimeVerify.sys.mjs:133:14 openpgp: Found signed MIME message; micalg=pgp-sha256

Does simply singing without encryption require some special settings?

Filtering on this: adservice.google.com, in the body of messages does not work. I suspect message filters only look at headers. Is that the case?

Lately I have difficulties logging-in to my two different e-mail providers. I have had them for years without any problems. Both don't let me log-in anymore. They want me to deactivate my ad-blocker - but I do not have an ad blocker installed with Mozilla Firefox! There is no such sign on the upper right and in the themes there is none either. The data protection is on standard. Although I agree to cookies but this doesn't help at all. So: where is the problem and why all of a sudden? What can I do? thanks in advance for your help.

Dear Mozilla support,

I represent a company that is providing a SaaS-service, in said service our marketing teams wants to implement thirdparty scripts, but we need to make sure that those scripts don't have access to the DOM to ensure the confidentiality of the information in the service.

What I've found out so far is that fenced frames seems to be a good way to solve this, see the following https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/fencedframe.

However the implementation for this element is still lacking in firefox, so i'm wondering if it will be implemented and when if so. We know that the feature is still experimental but it's something we would like to test and see if it's the way forward for our thirdparty scripts.