Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

percentage-based vertical positioning dependent on block width?

  • 1 cavab
  • 6 have this problem
  • 25 views
  • Last reply by schwal

more options

I seem to have found an issue when firefox is positioning blocks based on percentage values and margin offsets.

in short, look at this page: http://akos.maroy.hu/~akos/frontend/experiment/awake.html

the intended size of the image section is 75% of the available area, both vertically and horizontally. the intended location of the image section is so that the it's in the middle both vertically and horizontally.

while this works horizontally, it seems that the vertical position of the image depends on the horizontal width of the window. if one changed the width of the window, the image will shift vertically.

I seem to have found an issue when firefox is positioning blocks based on percentage values and margin offsets. in short, look at this page: http://akos.maroy.hu/~akos/frontend/experiment/awake.html the intended size of the image section is 75% of the available area, both vertically and horizontally. the intended location of the image section is so that the it's in the middle both vertically and horizontally. while this works horizontally, it seems that the vertical position of the image depends on the horizontal width of the window. if one changed the width of the window, the image will shift vertically.

Chosen solution

This is not exclusive to Firefox. Your problem is that margin-top uses "%" to mean "% of width". http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_margin-top.asp

Read this answer in context 👍 1

All Replies (1)

more options

Seçilmiş Həll

This is not exclusive to Firefox. Your problem is that margin-top uses "%" to mean "% of width". http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_margin-top.asp