i am using TB 115.10.1 (64-bit) on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
expected behavior:
the msg should be moved to the junk folder on Local Folders, marked as junk and NOT placed in … (funda kabanzi)
i am using TB 115.10.1 (64-bit) on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
expected behavior:
the msg should be moved to the junk folder on Local Folders, marked as junk and NOT placed in the Inbox
actual behavior:
the msg is usually (but not always) copied to the folder "junk" on "Local Folders" and a copy is left in the Inbox
i have many other filters like this, most always work, some occasionally do not. this particular filter has approx 30 such rules each with different matching content, some with domain names, some with portions of IP address. furthermore, other filter rules of similar nature mostly work but occasionally do not.
i am using a customized header, "Received:"
the filter (named "received by #10" :
apply filter when: Filter Before Junk Classification
match any of the following
Received contains [128.245. # should match all 128.245.x.x hosts
perform these actions:
Move Message to junk on Local Folders
Set Junk Status to junk
Stop Filter Execution
one of the "Received:" headers contains:
Received: from mta.s.alivebusinessplan.com ([128.245.246.45]) by mx.mail.com...
filter log content:
[6/2/24, 17:04:06 GMT-4] Applied filter "received by #10" to message from
"Mark White (ABP)" <send@s.alivebusinessplan.com> - 66,000% upside on tiny
biotech at 6/2/24, 17:04:04 GMT-4 junk score
[6/2/24, 17:04:06 GMT-4] Applied filter "received by #10" to message from
"Mark White (ABP)" <send@s.alivebusinessplan.com> - 66,000% upside on tiny
biotech at 6/2/24, 17:04:04 GMT-4 moved message id
= 4910df06-d805-41a4-96af-5e814f6cfc97@iad4s13mta861.xt.local to
mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Junk
[6/2/24, 17:04:06 GMT-4] Applied filter "received by #10" to message from
" Mark White (ABP)" <send@s.alivebusinessplan.com> - 66,000% upside on tiny
biotech at 6/2/24, 17:04:04 GMT-4 execution stopped
questions:
1. why this behavior? what'd i do wrong?
2. is there a limit on the number of filters?
3. is there a limit on the number of rules per filter?