When using Linux to connect to networks, sometimes I need to download a certificate, so I can use it when trying to connect to that network. Firefox absolutely refuses to…
When using Linux to connect to networks, sometimes I need to download a certificate, so I can use it when trying to connect to that network. Firefox absolutely refuses to download .crt files. Firefox will only ever give me the message "this certificate is already installed". I had to download Opera so I could download the certificate so I could connect to my university's network. I can't change what Firefox does with .crt files in Preferences>General>Applications because it doesn't try to download it, and I don't have the option to add something.
Using KDE Neon 5.17 with Firefox 69.02, if I use a dark theme with KDE (Breeze Dark), I can't override Firefox to fully be a light theme. This was working fine up until t…
Using KDE Neon 5.17 with Firefox 69.02, if I use a dark theme with KDE (Breeze Dark), I can't override Firefox to fully be a light theme. This was working fine up until today, so something recent changed in an update.
KDE is set to "Breeze Dark" as the theme. KDE's option for GKT2 and GTK3 theme ( settings -> gnome/gtk application style) are set to "Breeze" (light theme). Firefox's theme is set to "light" (it was working with "default" as well before).
Almost all GUI elements are defaulting to dark. Menu items, tooltips, scrollbars, checkboxes etc. are dark. Browsing to bugzilla.mozilla.org (which seems to detect if you're in a dark theme/mode) will display in a dark css theme.
I've set the following in about:config, but it doesn't seem to fix anything: ui.systemUsesDarkTheme;0 (fixes the CSS bugzilla issue but nothing else) widget.content.gtk-theme-override;Breeze (or Breeze:light) widget.content.allow-gtk-dark-theme;false
Basically, despite the fact that i've flipped every switch I can think of to tell firefox "use a light color scheme", it still wants to be in the system's overall dark theme. And again, this was working fine a day ago.
Hi, I would like to point out that the drag n drop feature of Firefox is not really good. I have used many linux distribution and faced this problem from the day I starte…
Hi, I would like to point out that the drag n drop feature of Firefox is not really good.
I have used many linux distribution and faced this problem from the day I started using Linux. I thought Firefox team would notice this, and work on this, so I didn't report any bug. But the problem stayed the same.
The Problem: When you try to drag a file from any file manager (I used Nautilus, Nemo, Thunar, Pcmanfm, and Dolphin file managers) on Linux, it will not instantly pop the "Drag files here" on supported websites. For example, when you try to upload files to mega, you have to drag and drop multiple times before getting it working. That doesn't happen with Chromium.
Even worse, if you try to drag and drop hundreds of files, Firefox will crash. I have also tried Firefox Nightly and Firefox Beta. Same. No improvement on them. Here I would like to attach a screenshot of the crash.
I'm running Manjaro linux XFCE 64bit. I have the latest version of Firefox installed from the Manjaro repositories (69.0.3-1). The flashplugin is also installed from the …
I'm running Manjaro linux XFCE 64bit. I have the latest version of Firefox installed from the Manjaro repositories (69.0.3-1). The flashplugin is also installed from the Manjaro repositories and is the latest version (126.96.36.1990-1). In my plugin settings, Flash is set to ask to activate, and I've even tried turning off the "Block dangerous and intrusive Flash content" setting. Most websites that need Flash don't recognize that it is installed at all.
When I use Adobe's tools to check if Flash is installed, (https://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player.html) this page doesn't show the ask to activate plugin in the URL bar until after I click on "Check Now" so their tool shows that I do not have Flash installed or enabled. If I click allow Flash on this page and then refresh the page, it seems like Flash gets disabled for that website again, and clicking "Check Now" once again shows that Flash is not installed or enabled.
Another page to check if it is installed is (https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/about/) which I found from downloading the flash plugin directly from Adobe in a readme.txt file. This page shows the Ask to activate directly on the Flash content, and when I click Allow, it recognizes that I have version 188.8.131.520 installed.
Most websites with Flash content that I want to use just don't show the Ask to activate prompt and show that I need to install Flash with the link to download from Adobe. I've tried uninstalling Flash and reinstalling, then rebooting my computer but that didn't help. This seems to be a reoccuring problem for me on linux, not just with Manjaro, but also Ubuntu, and even with other web browsers based on Chromium, like Brave browser. Does anyone know what causes this or how I can get Flash working on some pages?
I have a Firefox Sync account since Firefox Sync has been introduced. I changed my primary email address at a time, when Firefox Sync did not support changing email addre…
I have a Firefox Sync account since Firefox Sync has been introduced. I changed my primary email address at a time, when Firefox Sync did not support changing email addresses. I now checked to see if changing email addresses was possible and indeed, you can now add a secondary email address and switch it to be the primary one. So I tries to add my current email address as a secondary, but it fails with "This email was already verified by another user". I thought that maybe I had created an additional Firefox Sync account with the new email address and tried to log in with it, but that fails with "Primary account email required for sign-in". I am not aware of any other account and I checked my mailboxes (including the trash) to see if I have any registration or account change emails, but I cannot find anything. And given that fact, that I changed the email address before secondary emails were I think I also cannot see how it would even be possible.
Is there anyway to find the primary email address (or the account) using only a secondary email address?
If that is not possible, I'd like to have the secondary email address removed from whatever account it is attached to. I can proof I'm the only owner of that address. Would that be possible?