搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

Why did you spent time for integration of Pocket and not in solving the "Logjam"-vulberability?

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 10 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 cor-el

more options

Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.

Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.

被采纳的解决方案

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.

定位到答案原位置 👍 0

所有回复 (2)

more options

hi thairis, mozilla cannot "solve" the logjam vulnerability since this is a vulnerability in the configuration of web-servers (that their respective owners, admins would have to fix). all a browser can do (and firefox 39 will do) is to disallow users from accessing insecure servers and displaying an error message instead. until then you can use this mozilla-provided addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/disable-dhe/

more options

选择的解决方案

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.