Avatar for Username

Претражи подршку

Избегните преваре подршке. Никада од вас нећемо тражити да зовете или шаљете поруке на број или да делите личне податке. Пријавите сумњиве радње преко „Пријавите злоупотребу” опције.

Learn More

Ова тема је архивирана. Питајте друго питање ако вам је потребна помоћ.

Debugger source list pane not organized by directory

  • 2 одговорa
  • 1 има овај проблем
  • 1 преглед
  • Последњи одговор послао sammmuel

sammmuel
sammmuel
more options

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane

Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome.

Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome. Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux
Приложени снимци екрана

Изабрано решење

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!

Прочитајте овај одговор са објашњењем 👍 0

Сви одговори (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I see this feature in the current Nightly build (56.0a1), so you will have to wait until this lands in the Developer Edition.

The documents on the MDN website usually reflect the state of the latest Nightly builds version and not all features may be present in other releases.

sammmuel
sammmuel Власник питања
more options

Одабрано решење

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!