Поиск в Поддержке

Избегайте мошенников, выдающих себя за службу поддержки. Мы никогда не попросим вас позвонить, отправить текстовое сообщение или поделиться личной информацией. Сообщайте о подозрительной активности, используя функцию «Пожаловаться».

Learn More

Can Firefox properly support IPV6 Tunnels?

  • Нет ответов
  • 0 имеют эту проблему
  • 3 просмотра
more options

I am using both Developer (aurora) and release versions. I am using a Hurricane Electric 6in4 tunnel for my IPV6 functionality due to Exede's delays in IPV6 implementation. The tunnel terminates at my ASUS RT-AC3200 running ASUSWRT Merlin so IPV6 looks native to my systems. IPV4 and IPV6 only sites work fine but I suppose due to the tunnel delay, most dual stack (IPV4&IPV6) sites load as IPV4. I believe I should have the same experience as a native IPV6, which I have seen on my daughter's Comcast connected systems, but this is currently not so. I think there should compensation, preferably configurable, for the tunnel overhead so Firefox's behavior no longer looks like it prefers IPV4 but IPV6 first. Is this not possible?


I am using both Developer (aurora) and release versions. I am using a Hurricane Electric 6in4 tunnel for my IPV6 functionality due to Exede's delays in IPV6 implementation. The tunnel terminates at my ASUS RT-AC3200 running ASUSWRT Merlin so IPV6 looks native to my systems. IPV4 and IPV6 only sites work fine but I suppose due to the tunnel delay, most dual stack (IPV4&IPV6) sites load as IPV4. I believe I should have the same experience as a native IPV6, which I have seen on my daughter's Comcast connected systems, but this is currently not so. I think there should compensation, preferably configurable, for the tunnel overhead so Firefox's behavior no longer looks like it prefers IPV4 but IPV6 first. Is this not possible?