It's okay, because I can still use a version of Firefox that actually works. I just don't get it. I thought you guys would be better than, google, yahoo, microsoft, and… (funda kabanzi)
It's okay, because I can still use a version of Firefox that actually works. I just don't get it. I thought you guys would be better than, google, yahoo, microsoft, and yet, you're no better than they are, constantly fixing things that aren't even broken.
If I came out with an operating system, or a web browser, or a website, and I wanted to make a change, I would do at least 6 months MINIMUM of gathering survey information, and see what the people think. AND, if people feel the need for a change, I would make that change BUT, I would also give them the option to switch back to the old version, and I would NEVER EVER take that option away. Unlike, youtube and yahoo have.
Your so called "new and improved" quantum, is junk. I don't use it, I hate it, it's worthless to me. I use an old version that still works with ALL OF MY PLUGINS AND ADD-ONS. So yea, thanks for that devs. Thanks. Just like Skype, I use an old version that works. All of this supposedly "new and improved" junk, is literally, junk.
See, I come from the days of DOS, when things worked flawlessly. We didn't have Windows, yet, thank god, and life was great. I have ZERO plans to use winjunk 10. I'm on 7 and staying with 7. Why? Because, I've got the options to customize windows how I want it to look, and I can set how I want my updates to come in. If I want classic windows, I can do that, ahhhh can't do that in 10 now can ya?? Yea, cause microjunk took that feature away. AND, I dislike it when a company is being shady, especially when they try to force my PC to make a change to a different OS. I was smart and avoided the entire thing.
TLDR: Well, you should probably read it, because I think it's important. Plus, I've read longer myself, being lazy isn't a luxury, and it's not that hard to read.