Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Lolu chungechunge lwabekwa kunqolobane. Uyacelwa ubuze umbuzo omusha uma udinga usizo.

When Privacy->Accept Cookies->Keep Until is set to "ask me every time" why does sessionStorage.getItem fail with SecurityError: The operation is insecure?

  • 7 uphendule
  • 11 zinale nkinga
  • 124 views
  • Igcine ukuphendulwa ngu finitarry

more options

A recent update has broken javascript sites which try to use localStorage or sessionStorage. I like to configure most sites to only keep cookies until the end of the session and sometimes want to grant sites the ability to persist cookies. To do this, I set "ask me every time" as the only change on the privacy tab of options. Changing this one setting to "they expire" or "I close Firefox" lets these web sites work properly. I get no prompts asking if I want to allow local storage.

All Replies (7)

more options

I understand that changing the preference to the later has fixed this issue? Or are you still asking about this error: "why does sessionStorage.getItem fail with SecurityError: The operation is insecure"

more options

My workaround is not an acceptable solution. I wish to be prompted for my cookie preference for every site I visit and I also want to be prompted for local storage use.

more options

That is the problem with DOM Storage or DOM indexedDB: there is no control over who is allowed to use them. I disabled both because of that.

I do have control over cookies. I disable them by default and make exceptions for those that I need. Some sites that I visit every day I allow to set persistent cookies. Others that I visit seldom I allow only session cookies. If a site does not absolutely need cookies, I do not bother allowing them. I have an extension that makes changing cookie permissions for the site I am visiting convenient. The advantage to this approach is that I do not need to delete any cookies, since I have only those that I need.

more options

I don't think this is a recent issue, although the error message in the console may have changed at some point. Are you finding that this affects a lot of sites you use?

The permission to use DOM storage has been linked to the cookie permission since 2006, since DOM storage can be used similarly to cookies. As a result, scripts that do not have permission to set cookies and try to use DOM storage die with a error. My speculation on why this happens with your setting is that cookies are treated as blocked unless and until you select a different permission in the dialog, and therefore DOM storage also is initially blocked.

Bugs were filed in 2007 and 2012 to try to improve the situation, for example, by having a clearer error message or a user interface for local storage permission, rather than having web apps suffer a silent failure.

I don't know what the solution to this is from the browser side. For example, it would be convenient for users with your setting if either of these were possible:

  • Firefox might pause the script in the site to wait and see what you choose before trying to access DOM storage in the blocked state. Not all scripts will complete correctly if paused.
  • Firefox might allow the site to use DOM storage temporarily and if you keep the site blocked, clear what the site wrote to storage and block further access.

If I could influence web app writers, since this issue hasn't gone away for 9 years and probably won't be changed in the near future, I would suggest they test for ability to write cookies before using DOM storage.

more options

jscher2000, With only session or temporary cookies being allowed, does the stuff in DOM storage disappear when the browser is closed, as the cookies do? Does what you said also apply to SeaMonkey?

more options

finitarry said

With only session or temporary cookies being allowed, does the stuff in DOM storage disappear when the browser is closed, as the cookies do? Does what you said also apply to SeaMonkey?

I do not know the answer to either of those questions. Definitely worth a test.

more options

I tried a test using Panopticlick. The DOM storage does seem to depend on cookie permissions, and with SeaMonkey. Figuring out whether the stored items disappear with disappearing cookies is a lot more tricky. I have Better Privacy installed and set to remove DOM storage items, and am not about to turn that off.