Firefox 社群討論區

I like to default to having threading on. It used to be that when I opened my Inbox, every email thread was closed/collapsed. Now they're open (started somewhat recently).

I can get numerous separate emails where each one can generate lots of responses, meaning they threads get long, sometimes within a few minutes or hours. Having them closed by default (rather than open or unthreaded) makes it to see each individual email chain and other interspersed single emails.

I tried google searching; also tried threaded and grouped by sort (with the default sort set to thread), and it doesn't seem to help. Any help would be appreciated!

Having a paid firefox relay subscription, can I incorporate Firefox relay masks into my Avira password management. I use a laptop under Windows 11, as well as a smartphone on Android, both using the same Avira password management software. More precise, how do I prevent a list of firefox relay masks is shown if an user name or email address is searched for/ or supposed to be provided by my avira password manager? Can I prevent that a list of relay masks is listed by inserting/deleting a check sign in what setting? Thanks in advance and Regards.

Moderator note: This question has been edited to correct the formatting.

just installed thunderbird on my new windows11 laptop and tried to add my comcast email account. i entered the email address and password and it sent me to a comcast web page to validate my email on imap.comcast.com. i am not on my home network so they sent a code to my phone which i entered successfully. it then asked for the address on my (comcast) account. i entered it and it told me it didn't recognize the address. I called comcast and finally got a human to talk with. we verified that my comcast account was set to allow third party access to my email. that's all the help she could give. i've run thunderbird on my windows 10 desktop with my comcast email for years with no problem. Has anyone encountered this problem?

When I go to see a firefox bug such as the following, https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-10/

There appears to be more details in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014390 located at the bottom. When I try to view the details it asks me to log in. I do not see any reason I should have to log in to view the issue as I only intend to view the bug. Why does it require a login ?

The Firefox advertising page

I clicked on the Wellnee link and their site is rigged to extort money! I chose the product (advertised as a discount), entered my bank details then instead of buying the product, I'm sent to a page where aside from just leaving the page, I find that i have to order 3 more of the same product, if I want to get the discount, so I exited the page, only to find that not only had I been charged for the original (without the discount!) but an additional charge had been taken!!!

Then I get a text message saying they couldn't connect to my email, so everything is done through texts (they had my email). When I went to their site they use a fake US phone number; there's no email, only a form (does it work?)

https://shop.trywellnee.com/

The fake US +1(844)961-3766

And why can't I contact Mozilla directly rather than this forum?

This is the most annoying behavior. For the most time I would like to use panel once or twice a day to ask some question to continue on conversation in some chat but whenever I close the AI chat-bot panel it resets its context and throws me onto the default page of the provider of my choosing. I have to click my way into the proper chat every time. Could a chat-bot panel keep its context or keep it session at the place where I left it?

I asked on 11 January 2026 Help for finding back my cookies. Got an answer by e-mail, but this disn't help to find my cookies and so I cannot manage these. Who can tell me please where I can find all my cookies? Thanks in advance. Regards Theo Koeppen

Hello

I want to add custom AI chatbot to Firefox. Here it is: https://bggpt.ai/ . Here is the models: https://models.bggpt.ai/ In which way this may be accomplish?

Best regards Atanas Petrov

This browser has been my preferred way to use the internet for years, after Chrome overloaded theirs with unneeded features that slowed the performance. I switched to Mozilla products because of their lightweight and private browsing options. Today, you pushed an "AI Kill Switch" instead of listening to community feedback that largely demanded the removal of all features using generative AI, and this is my final straw. I don't know who in the company is pushing for this, but if there's even the slightest chance of them reading my words; your product is shit and will remain shit for the rest of it's existence. AI features introduce security risks, slow performance noticably, and have such bad political pr attached to them, there's no crawling yourself back from this. You've labeled yourself as another ai company willing to burn all goodwill from your userbase for the percieved chance at acquiring profit. The bubble will pop, and you and your market value will go the way of every other internet browser that was okay for time but got too big for it's britches. You're an idiot for ever believing the ai hype and deciding to bet your entire company on the gamble. Firefox is, at best, only useful for downloading another browser, now. Way to become a direct competitor with Internet Explorer again.

I have found that Grok is more likely to provide a balanced answer than chatGPT, which usually swings to the left, and has a tendency to just make stuff up. I haven't really tried the rest on your list, I haven't even heard of some of them, for that matter. I don't understand why you couldn't include it, when you included all the rest. While I'm at it, why did you remove the upvote/down-vote in the new tab suggested sites? I was down-voting all of the far-left progressive garbage, out of tens of thousands of pages you never showed a single right-wing suggestion from sites like Fox, New York Post, etc., or even the center, like The Hill, but once I got rid all of the garbage from Huffington, Salon, Vox, Guardian, CNN, there were some good articles by sites like AP, Smithsonian, Scientific American, etc. that showed up and were center or center-left news, not propaganda. I'm giving up on the tab suggestions for now, I'll check it again sometime to see if you are still ignoring the 32% of the population who are right-wing Republican, and the about 38% of the population who are independent/center, to continue to concentrate on the 30% who are left-wing Democrats, and more particularly the tiny percentage who are Progressives among the Democrats. Instead of increasingly becoming the browser of choice for just one part of the population, it might be a good idea to think about representing the other 70% of the population as well.