搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

Learn More

Why did you spent time for integration of Pocket and not in solving the "Logjam"-vulberability?

  • 2 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 18 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 cor-el

more options

Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.

被選擇的解決方法

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 0

所有回覆 (2)

more options

hi thairis, mozilla cannot "solve" the logjam vulnerability since this is a vulnerability in the configuration of web-servers (that their respective owners, admins would have to fix). all a browser can do (and firefox 39 will do) is to disallow users from accessing insecure servers and displaying an error message instead. until then you can use this mozilla-provided addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/disable-dhe/

more options

選擇的解決方法

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.