Tìm kiếm hỗ trợ

Tránh các lừa đảo về hỗ trợ. Chúng tôi sẽ không bao giờ yêu cầu bạn gọi hoặc nhắn tin đến số điện thoại hoặc chia sẻ thông tin cá nhân. Vui lòng báo cáo hoạt động đáng ngờ bằng cách sử dụng tùy chọn "Báo cáo lạm dụng".

Learn More

Question about Root CA policy

  • Không có trả lời
  • 1 gặp vấn đề này
  • 3 lượt xem
more options

I have a question about this: https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Problematic_Practices

Is it really a problematic practice if a CA issues wildcard certificates under IV. (Individual validation). Yes, I know that for example EV's can only be issued to organizations and not natural persons, but limiting wildcard certificates to organizations I think its a bit too far. At least the identity of the person using a wildcard certificate is visible in the certificate, so if a individual is using his cert for phishing purposes, it can be easily tracked and prosecuted.

Or is the wikipedia page a bit incorrect about this? Because for example StartSSL does issue wildcard certificates to individuals (IV).

I have a question about this: https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Problematic_Practices Is it really a problematic practice if a CA issues wildcard certificates under IV. (Individual validation). Yes, I know that for example EV's can only be issued to organizations and not natural persons, but limiting wildcard certificates to organizations I think its a bit too far. At least the identity of the person using a wildcard certificate is visible in the certificate, so if a individual is using his cert for phishing purposes, it can be easily tracked and prosecuted. Or is the wikipedia page a bit incorrect about this? Because for example StartSSL does issue wildcard certificates to individuals (IV).