Showing questions tagged: Show all questions

Question regarding Salesforce and Firefox account privacy

Hello, and thanks for taking time to read my question. Firefox appears to be very privacy-focused. It is the impression from the first time you visit their website, and t… (read more)

Hello, and thanks for taking time to read my question.

Firefox appears to be very privacy-focused. It is the impression from the first time you visit their website, and the person-before-profit mentality seems to be well baked into the mozilla foundation and the company around it. However, in the 'Firefox Privacy Notice' that you are required to accept to create an account, it says that the users' email-address is sent to 'Salesforce', an independent company. Salesforce is, as I have understood, a marketing company or 'Customer relationship management', as they choose to call it.

What exactly is Salesforce and how do it affect me and other Firefox users?

Asked by It's-a-me, Maaaaaaaaaaario! 2 weeks ago

Wakeup error exceeds....

I am out of my league and maybe shouldn't have gone here but in diagnostics, I see the following: Date/Time: 2021-02-10 20:22:38.184 -0800 End time: 2021-0… (read more)

I am out of my league and maybe shouldn't have gone here but in diagnostics, I see the following:

Date/Time: 2021-02-10 20:22:38.184 -0800 End time: 2021-02-10 20:27:34.243 -0800 OS Version: macOS 11.2.1 (Build 20D74) Architecture: x86_64h Report Version: 32 Incident Identifier: 00D96FEA-36C4-4E45-B207-094483A6CCEC Share With Devs: Yes

Data Source: Microstackshots Shared Cache: BD3DF5DB-AF3C-3D09-B8D6-4352F71DDBEA slid base address 0x7fff20342000, slide 0x342000

Command: plugin-container Path: /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container Identifier: org.mozilla.plugincontainer Version:  ??? (1.0) PID: 2758

Event: wakeups Action taken: none Wakeups: 45001 wakeups over the last 296 seconds (152 wakeups per second average), exceeding limit of 150 wakeups per second over 300 seconds Wakeups limit: 45000 Limit duration: 300s Wakeups caused: 45001 Wakeups duration: 296s Duration: 296.06s Duration Sampled: 173.31s Steps: 7

Hardware model: MacBookAir8,2 Active cpus: 4 Boot args: chunklist-security-epoch=0 -chunklist-no-rev2-dev

Fan speed: 8014 rpm

Heaviest stack for the target process:

 2  ??? (<53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72> + 85937) [0x1089a4fb1]
 1  _pthread_cond_wait + 1305 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 28322) [0x7fff20653ea2]


Powerstats for: plugin-container (FirefoxCP) [2758] UUID: 3F35CF07-9511-37A2-83C1-CE78E7014CD0 Build Version: 1.0 Path: /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container Architecture: x86_64 Footprint: 318.48 MB -> 282.57 MB (-35.91 MB) Start time: 2021-02-10 20:24:22.917 -0800 End time: 2021-02-10 20:27:16.229 -0800 Num samples: 7 (100%) Primary state: 4 samples Non-Frontmost App, Non-Suppressed, User mode, Effective Thread QoS Default, Requested Thread QoS Default, Override Thread QoS Unspecified User Activity: 0 samples Idle, 7 samples Active Power Source: 0 samples on Battery, 7 samples on AC

 2  ??? (<53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72> + 85937) [0x1089a4fb1]
   1  _pthread_cond_wait + 1421 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 28438) [0x7fff20653f16]
     1  _pthread_mutex_firstfit_lock_slow + 211 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 8636) [0x7fff2064f1bc]
       1  __psynch_mutexwait + 10 (libsystem_kernel.dylib + 12486) [0x7fff206210c6]
         1  <Kernel mode>
   1  _pthread_cond_wait + 1305 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 28322) [0x7fff20653ea2]
 1  ??? [0x67fe89d85ec9001e]
   1  ??? (<53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72> + 86678) [0x1089a5296]
     1  _pthread_mutex_firstfit_unlock_slow + 250 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 9207) [0x7fff2064f3f7]
       1  __psynch_mutexdrop + 10 (libsystem_kernel.dylib + 12794) [0x7fff206211fa]
         1  <Kernel mode>
 1  ??? (<8C3B07AD-A96B-383A-94DC-902CCE4CD511> + 62292030971077) [0x38a8def0dcc5]
 1  ??? (<DAC425C3-0546-3B6F-A449-72839C32FF63> + 5538918) [0x10b359466]
   1  pthread_mutex_unlock + 107 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 8793) [0x7fff2064f259]
 1  ??? (<53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72> + 86678) [0x1089a5296]
   1  _pthread_mutex_firstfit_unlock_slow + 250 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 9207) [0x7fff2064f3f7]
     1  __psynch_mutexdrop + 10 (libsystem_kernel.dylib + 12794) [0x7fff206211fa]
       1  <Kernel mode>
 1  ??? (<53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72> + 56294) [0x10899dbe6]
 Binary Images:
          0x108705000 -                ???  org.mozilla.plugincontainer (1.0)  <3F35CF07-9511-37A2-83C1-CE78E7014CD0>  /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container.app/Contents/MacOS/plugin-container
          0x108990000 -                ???  ???                                <53CD927F-FD7E-3AB8-B7E6-539A61094C72>
          0x10ae11000 -                ???  ???                                <DAC425C3-0546-3B6F-A449-72839C32FF63>
          0x160900000 -                ???  ???                                <8C3B07AD-A96B-383A-94DC-902CCE4CD511>
       0x7fff2061e000 -     0x7fff2064cfff  libsystem_kernel.dylib (7195.81.3) <AB413518-ECDE-3F04-A61C-278D3CF43076>  /usr/lib/system/libsystem_kernel.dylib
       0x7fff2064d000 -     0x7fff20658fff  libsystem_pthread.dylib (454.80.2) <B989DF6C-ADFE-3AF9-9C91-07D2521F9E47>  /usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib

Asked by Ryq Seattle 2 weeks ago

Firefox Bookmarks - Too few tags permitted

Hi, I trust you all had a (well deserved) merry Christmas. I have a question regarding bookmarks in Firefox. This is something that has been bugging me for some years (ye… (read more)

Hi, I trust you all had a (well deserved) merry Christmas.

I have a question regarding bookmarks in Firefox. This is something that has been bugging me for some years (yes, it has taken me that long to get around to asking about this). Over the last decade I have amounted a large assortment of bookmarks, which I have carefully structured and also add suitable tags to (as I know what I am likely to search for in future). This works very well for me and it's surprising how my past self has been so accurate at predicting what I may find useful to my present/future self, when it comes to searching for something in my bookmarks.

Herein lies my problem though. I often need to put in a number of tags to make a given web resource findable in the future. For example, I was just reading up about the Google compute module, and have been trying to enter the following tags: Google Edge TPU (Neural compute) sbc network artificial intelligence machine vision intel stick Quantization

This number of keywords is too long, yet I don't want to really remove any of these words/acronyms. Why are the bookmarks so heavily restricted with regards to tags? I see that when I look at the bookmarks, there is also a **keywords** option too, but those words are not searchable, so I don't see much value in placing anything in there.

I am not 100% sure, but I could swear too, that bookmarks used to have a description section too, where I could make notes regarding a weblink (EG: "this website has particularly good recipes for pasta, but ignore their vegatarian options as they don't review very favorably"). I may be thinking of another web browser from a long time ago. Having a description field for each bookmark (which is not restricted to a ridiculously short length like the **Tags** field) would be an excellent idea.

so, to summarize: 1. How do I work around having such a short **Tag** field (and when is Mozilla going to fix this?) 2. Can we please have a Description field for each bookmark. Please!

These are just about my only criticisms of what is otherwise my absolute favorite of browsers. Thanks for the great work and effort by all, and have a prosperous and healthy 2021.

Asked by Witenite 2 months ago

Last reply by knowledge is like power 1 month ago

  • Archived

hi Firefox brozer does not work ?!!§

Hi firefox does not work and it clashes with 1 Password ? please help me get firefox up and going again as I have been very satisfied with firefox for many years but now … (read more)

Hi firefox does not work and it clashes with 1 Password ? please help me get firefox up and going again as I have been very satisfied with firefox for many years but now must look into changing browzer if this cant be solved ASAP

Asked by Ann-Brit Tangstad 6 months ago

Last reply by jscher2000 6 months ago

  • Archived

Update

So if you get Firefox on laptop and or PC you can have extensions such as ad blockers, ghostery, and other useful/helpful extensions to make the clients browsing more ple… (read more)

So if you get Firefox on laptop and or PC you can have extensions such as ad blockers, ghostery, and other useful/helpful extensions to make the clients browsing more pleasurable. I love the extensions on PC, however when i use firefox on IOS it seems to not have or support extensions such as ghostery or an ad blockers, is it possible to change this so that IOS could have extensions much like that of PC and Laptop.

Asked by Adam 7 months ago

Last reply by FredMcD 7 months ago

  • Archived

Questions about Firefox software for corporate approval

With security concerns on the rise, our company has required that all software installed on their systems go through an approval process. As part of that approval process… (read more)

With security concerns on the rise, our company has required that all software installed on their systems go through an approval process.

As part of that approval process, they want to know the following:

  • Is the software signed by a trusted third party?
  • Is the software downloaded from a US hosted facility?
  • Does the software perform call backs to the software maker?

Thank you!

Asked by mrmuffin10 8 months ago

Last reply by Andrew 8 months ago

  • Archived

HI, Last two days I have face problem for calling facebook sharing window it is thirdparty call so pls allow call in firefox browser other browser it is working

I have give Facebook third-party call on client page but currently it is not working on Firefox it shows the "X-Frame-Options" issue please solve it.

Asked by mark27henry 1 year ago

Last reply by cor-el 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

Why xul.dll contains string west-1.eb.amazonaws.com?

When looking into "c:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\xul.dll " of my Firefox installation there is a string " west-1.eb.amazonaws.com" (= Service in Amazon AWS). However I… (read more)

When looking into "c:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\xul.dll " of my Firefox installation there is a string " west-1.eb.amazonaws.com" (= Service in Amazon AWS). However I can't find it in Firefox sources.

Does anybody know why it is there?

Firefox version is 66.0.5. Xul.dll file version is 66.0.5.7066

Thanks.

Asked by hpnothp 1 year ago

Answered by philipp 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

Could you tell me the maximum supported version of Firefox in this OS environment?

Hello, I am a developer working on Red Hat Linux R5.10. Could you tell me the maximum supported version of Firefox in this OS environment? The current version of Red Hat … (read more)

Hello, I am a developer working on Red Hat Linux R5.10.

Could you tell me the maximum supported version of Firefox in this OS environment? The current version of Red Hat Linux R5.10 is related to the following environment. gtk2, glib 2.0, pango 1.14

The latest version(66.0.3) of Firefox has requirements below

-GTK + 3.4 or higher
-GLib 2.22 or higher
-Pango 1.22 or higher

This OS does not meet all the requirements.

help please

Asked by namhun 1 year ago

Answered by Balázs Meskó 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

How to configure Firefox so that it will load everything from cache after restart, in case I am offline?

I wish to configure my Firefox so that it will cache everything and keep this cache, so that when I restart Firefox and am offline, it loads everything from cache and dis… (read more)

I wish to configure my Firefox so that it will cache everything and keep this cache, so that when I restart Firefox and am offline, it loads everything from cache and displays fully loaded websites, even though I am offline.

Only when I try to access a not yet opened website or force reload of a website, it shall try to get things from the Internet and fail, since I am offline.

What settings are needed for this to work?

I usually start Firefox continuing my last session, so it feels like a huge waste to reload everything, mostly websites that do not change much anyway. It would be nice to have them display instantly, because everything is already on my local machine and on top be able to read all the websites I already loaded offline, since everything is cached.

Asked by ZelphirKaltstahl 1 year ago

Answered by jscher2000 1 year ago

  • Archived

As an admin can I add certificate exceptions to Firefox for all users?

As an admin in our organization I wanted to add two "Add Exception..." so end users do not have to get a certificate warning and click through to two places. One is a con… (read more)

As an admin in our organization I wanted to add two "Add Exception..." so end users do not have to get a certificate warning and click through to two places.

One is a connection to a systray service, the url is https://127.0.0.1:51763 and to test and validate this service for the web application, one must first click test in the app, then click Advanced and Add Exception on the "Your connection is not secure" page. The second is https://tablet.sigwebtablet.com:47290/SigWeb/ which has a Thawte certificate on it, but still requires clicking through.

This is for an in house financial operating system. The vendor did place our wildcard cert on the main page which works, its just these two service test URLs cause an issue, and since we do not own these certificates, we cannot re-sign them with a trusted Subject Alternative Name.

If I can do this with Firefox CCK or Group Policy, that would be fine. We do have Firefox trust our Windows Certificate store, so maybe there is something we can do already in Group Policy and Windows Certificates? I'm not sure because the cert at 127.0.0.1 is signed by corelation.local and there are NO SAN names on it, so even trying to use GPO's to import it to the Computers Trusted Root Certificates may not be enough.

Thanks.

Asked by kjstech 2 years ago

Last reply by Mike Kaply 1 year ago

  • Archived

In FF 60.6.0 ESR - How do I make it so that when a user opens firefox for the first time they get a default profile that I have configured.

In the previous versions I could have a default profile configured and when a user launched FF for the first time it would copy that default profile to the users profile… (read more)

In the previous versions I could have a default profile configured and when a user launched FF for the first time it would copy that default profile to the users profile. This allowed me to set a variety of corporate configuration defaults.

We currently run Windows 7 (moving to 10 soon) Trying to get 60.6.0 ESR to work.

Asked by BryanGa 1 year ago

Last reply by Mike Kaply 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

How to see synced content in another browser?

Hi all, I will unfortunately soon lose the ability to use Firefox at work because my company's IT department don't want to support it anymore as we upgrade to Windows 10.… (read more)

Hi all,

I will unfortunately soon lose the ability to use Firefox at work because my company's IT department don't want to support it anymore as we upgrade to Windows 10.

So, I will have to use either IE, Edge or Chrome. Ideally I would like an extension which I can use to connect one of these browsers (probably Chrome) to Firefox, but since that doesn't exist the next best thing is to be able to manually "sync" things.

First, how do I view the synced content for my Firefox Account in a web page? Is there a way to access it from https://accounts.firefox.com/settings

Second, how to I add things to this?

Mainly I am interested in syncing tabs. Browser history would also be useful but I can see how this could be very difficult. Bookmarks would be an alternative method of syncing history.

Thanks :)

Asked by madbilly 1 year ago

Answered by FredMcD 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

Can root update firefox from command line?

I run debian 9.8, and rather than using the distro version of firefox, I run the mozilla version. This works just fine, but when firefox detects that it needs updating, … (read more)

I run debian 9.8, and rather than using the distro version of firefox, I run the mozilla version. This works just fine, but when firefox detects that it needs updating, the only way I know to do it is to log into Xwindows using the root account and do it from there. I don't want a *user* account to own the browser, but I can't seem to find a way to update without Xwindows. There are some old links about using .MAR files, but the most recent one is a couple of years old, and due to appearances, i suspect - although i didn't confirm it by following the links - that only older versions, not the current one, can be loaded that way. Enough people have looked at this that it would appear worth putting in a flat warning that this cannot be done, so that people don't waste their time looking for something that doesn't exist. Help!

Asked by tanstaafl-tanj 1 year ago

Answered by tanstaafl-tanj 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

Determine version of Firefox last used by a profile backup

I keep an archive of profile backups on an external hard drive. The backups are compressed, and I usually include the version of Firefox last used by the (principle) prof… (read more)

I keep an archive of profile backups on an external hard drive. The backups are compressed, and I usually include the version of Firefox last used by the (principle) profile in the compressed archive filename (e.g., userinfo-firefox-56.0_date). I also make a semi-regular sync backup of the currently used profile. So far, so good.

My currently synced backup, which has not been compressed and archived, is about a month old. (I did say semi-regular.) I would like to compress and archive it before syncing, but I am no longer sure of the exact version of Firefox it used. I usually run updates when released, and can suppose Firefox 65.x, but what if I would like to be more exact? After running a search of files containing "version" in the main profile, I came across a file named compatibility.ini, which resides in the root directory. The contents are as follows:

[Compatibility] LastVersion=65.0.1_20190211233335/20190211233335 LastOSABI=WINNT_x86_64-msvc LastPlatformDir=C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox LastAppDir=C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\browser

Is this a reliable way to detect the last version of Firefox used by the profile?

Asked by michapma 1 year ago

Answered by cor-el 1 year ago

  • Archived

Offline Sync

Hey there, is it possible to Sync Bookmarks without Internet? For example, in a Windows-Based Domain-Network? I have a Domain-Server an medium amount of clients, who need… (read more)

Hey there,

is it possible to Sync Bookmarks without Internet? For example, in a Windows-Based Domain-Network? I have a Domain-Server an medium amount of clients, who needs a browser to access some Browser-Based Systems via IP-Adress. This systems change eventually and I am looking for a way, to make the life for the client more easy.

thx in advance and best regards

Asked by blaze4k 1 year ago

Last reply by the-edmeister 1 year ago

  • Solved
  • Archived

Considerations when upgrading from V41 or V43

Long time user (15-20 yrs?), I have been avoiding the "next" upgrade for several years for various reasons (hate change, fave add-ons go away, hate change, not broke-don'… (read more)

Long time user (15-20 yrs?), I have been avoiding the "next" upgrade for several years for various reasons (hate change, fave add-ons go away, hate change, not broke-don't fix, hate change...). But I am now running into a few websites that won't permit this browser, so it may be time to move on. With heavy adblocking and tracker-blocking and my benign web browsing habits, I've not been concerned about security (never had a virus in 20 years - knock wood). It's just full functionality and slowness at this point. At this point, I see even my Classic Theme Restorer is no longer available, so I'll just have to bite the bullet on aesthetics and deal with a modern browser. However, a couple of things are unclear:

1. does 20 years of bookmark history (and remembered history) affect memory footprint. I only refer to existing bookmarks occasionally these days and may consider a full purge. Partial purge would probably be too time-consuming. Maybe even a full profile purge might be worthwhile for a true clean slate. Maybe FF has come a long way and old extensions and settings won't be necessary. I also have several about: settings that I may (or may not?) miss.

2. Are automatic updates unavoidable in newer versions? I read about "manual" but it sounded temporary.

3. The permissions on many potential add-ons I've looked at are quite unnerving... e.g many of them require full access to ALL my data (usernames and passwords!!!) and I know the function has no need for such. Who has time to investigate these fully for safety? Is there any anti-malware vetting required for add-ons to be available?

4. I know newer is generally faster, but FF has a history of growing and slowing down after upgrades. My hardware isn't getting any newer (although its more than ample for my current needs), but software tends to be developed on latest and greatest hardware. How does latest FF compare to circa V41 in memory usage?


In any case, I thought I would give the latest vesion a whirl on my old Vista laptop (which is currently at V43) and check it out before plunging in on my W7 work PC or home PC. Any answers or insight into such a big jump are much appreciated.

Asked by Wendy444 2 years ago

Answered by cor-el 2 years ago

  • Archived

Forced updates is absolutely lame

Background: Was forced to upgrade to version 65 which broke the tabs on bottom setting. Tried to install a ESR version but it kept crashing. Went back to version 64 whi… (read more)

Background:

Was forced to upgrade to version 65 which broke the tabs on bottom setting. Tried to install a ESR version but it kept crashing. Went back to version 64 which was immediately forced to upgrade to the broken version again (which I didn't allow).

The problem is this. The people who have implemented this forced upgrade feature are probably using Windows 10 (forced updating) and are used to being treated like second class citizens by Microsoft. Forced upgrading is completely inappropriate. I've used browsers since Netscape, all of the Firefox versions, rarely use any other browser. Never had a problem except with your forced updates.

Lucky for me I found the registry fix for admins to disable updates. Reasonably inconvenient but a hell of a lot better than putting up with forced updates that break the browser.

Question:

How about bringing back the choice to upgrade. How about, at least giving two reminders to upgrade and then disabling the messaging. This messaging is extremely disrespectful - i.e. we are going to keep on annoying you until you upgrade (to a broken system).

Asked by NormmroN 2 years ago

Last reply by the-edmeister 2 years ago

  • Archived

I've been using Firefox for years... but don't have password? Have never had a password.

I don't know if I'm a member of Firefox or not... Been using it for years but have never had a Password. While here...do not understand the article from Healthgrades -- l… (read more)

I don't know if I'm a member of Firefox or not... Been using it for years but have never had a Password.

While here...do not understand the article from Healthgrades -- ll about COPD looks like advertising to me.

Asked by wait4ME 2 years ago

Last reply by McCoy 2 years ago