Viser spørgsmål med mærket: Vis alle spørgsmål
  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

new live bookmarks will only save to Bookmarks toolbar after upgrade to 40.0.0

I upgraded to 40.0.0 today. I found a site with an RSS feed that I wanted to follow. I keep my RSS feeds in folders on my Bookmark Toolbar. I tried to load it to the appr… (læs mere)

I upgraded to 40.0.0 today. I found a site with an RSS feed that I wanted to follow. I keep my RSS feeds in folders on my Bookmark Toolbar. I tried to load it to the appropriate folder, but it loaded to the toolbar itself. The feed showed new entries. I tried to move it to the proper folder and it stopped listing any RSS entries. I again tried to save the new feed to the proper folder. This time it did not appear on the Bookmark toolbar, but it did not appear in the folder I had said to load it to. I went back to 39.0.3 and it works properly. I am running the LiveClick addon, if that helps. I am posting using 39.0.3. All other extensions are what were in use under 40.0.0

Stillet af percysowner for 5 år siden

Besvaret af cor-el for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Spinning ball of death, have checked all add-ons

Hi, Am using Firefox 40.0.2 on a Macbook Air and have the spinning ball of death all the time recently and only on Firefox... other browsers are ok. When I disabled all A… (læs mere)

Hi, Am using Firefox 40.0.2 on a Macbook Air and have the spinning ball of death all the time recently and only on Firefox... other browsers are ok. When I disabled all Add-ons, the spinning ball stops. When I painstakingly disabled and tested one at a time, the spinning ball never went away. How is this possible? Is there anything I'm not thinking of or anything else I can try? Here are screenshots of all my add-ons. Thanks!!

Stillet af ralston6000 for 5 år siden

Besvaret af Scribe for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Your last update has disabled add-ons for signature issues, when will it be corrected?

With your latest update, I can no longer use LastPass, TrendMicro, in the toolbar, or FBPurity to clean up the junk I don't have time to see. I get the message that their… (læs mere)

With your latest update, I can no longer use LastPass, TrendMicro, in the toolbar, or FBPurity to clean up the junk I don't have time to see. I get the message that their signatures are not usable, and you disabled them. I can't use Firefox without them, so how do we fix this issue?

Stillet af dori36 for 4 år siden

Besvaret af dori36 for 4 år siden

  • Låst
  • Arkiveret

Is it possible to disable the "Recently bookmarked" function?

This is a new feature that has just appeared, but I don't need it (it's indicated in a red box in the attached screenshot). However, it takes up space on the bookmarks po… (læs mere)

This is a new feature that has just appeared, but I don't need it (it's indicated in a red box in the attached screenshot). However, it takes up space on the bookmarks pop-up window. I suppose it's a sign that I need to clean and organize my bookmarks, but I still would prefer to turn it off so it doesn't appear in the pop-up. I'm using Firefox 49.0b1 on a 2013 MacBookPro running OS 10.10.5 Thanks!

Stillet af thosbren for 4 år siden

Seneste svar af jooooooooooo for 3 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Bigger fireFox address bar drop down font?

To, whom this may concern, I recently notice the changes on FireFox 48.0.1 where the address bar drop down fonts has been made smaller, wondering if there is anyway to m… (læs mere)

To, whom this may concern,

I recently notice the changes on FireFox 48.0.1 where the address bar drop down fonts has been made smaller, wondering if there is anyway to make the address bar drop down fonts bigger or as it was in the previous versions?

I already have a short sight vision & wear glasses by making the font size smaller than previous versions is current a big problem for me at the moment.

Help on this matter would be appreciated, Jessica

Stillet af Jessica for 4 år siden

Besvaret af Jessica for 4 år siden

  • Låst
  • Arkiveret

in person help

About "Be Nice" .. not so nice below, BUT I AM SIMPLY FED UP WITH FIREFOX SCREWUPS ... YES, SWITCHING TO GOOGLE CHROME, BUT I NEED THIS FIXED TO GET MY DATA BACK AND EXPO… (læs mere)

About "Be Nice" .. not so nice below, BUT I AM SIMPLY FED UP WITH FIREFOX SCREWUPS ... YES, SWITCHING TO GOOGLE CHROME, BUT I NEED THIS FIXED TO GET MY DATA BACK AND EXPORT :

Once again ... Firefox has destroyed my bookmarks, add-ons etc. when I "updated" Firefox ... Macbook Pro OS X

in the past, I have cumulatively taken hours to fix this -- on 4-5 occasions of the SAME PROBLEM (read: unfixed by Mozilla/Firefox)

a) why cant Firefox get their stuff together? .. WHY DOESN'T MOZILLA/FIREFOX FIX THIS !!!!


b) do they think my time is free? how can they, getting paid for their software development, expect me to lose money away from my business every time I "upgrade" ... so presumptious, so offensive, so oblivious to its "clients"

c) I don't know of any ... any ... any .... any software developer that requires a user to fix it's software -- again sometimes taking hours, including trying to find Help like this Mozillla user "support" input -- after an "upgrade" ... simply unbelieveable, simply UNACCEPTABLE ... TO YOU FIREFOX PEOPLE OR ITS REPS ... WILL YOU PLEASE FIX THIS ISSUE AND GET WITH THE 21ST CENTURY? ....

d) WHERE IS THE “SUPPORT"? .. where is the IN PERSON support that is going to fix my computer after screwing up my long input data gathering with their so-called "upgrade" ???? Two things are for sure: 1) it's gonna get fixed and 2) I'm certainly not going to spend any more of my own time and lose money from my business to fix Firefox's programming screwups. DON’T KNOW OF ANY … ANY … ANY … ANY company that does not have IN-PERSON SUPPORT … software and its functions are complex .. they need to be supported through interpersonal interaction … every other company in the world knows this … why not Mozilla???? I just don’t get it.

e) For past and present, even this "help" note, where do I invoice Mozilla for my time lost? ... where headquarters? .. accounts payable?/ I assume one of the non-Mozilla, non-person reps knows the answer to this ... surely they don't expect me to lose money by way of their "upgraded" product.

f) As one of you reps sugggested last time this happened : "well you chose Firefox, ... if u don't like problems, go use another browser" ... gee, that's good customer support ... our product sucks so use another -- geez.

g) Indeed I now intend to use another, but I will first be satisfied by Mozilla/Firefox's restoration of my computer, cumulative time lost and literal restoration of data exactly as was before the "update", and the payment by Mozilla for all my time in trying to remediate this and if any data lost, the historical time used to cumulate and enter such data.

If anyone out there in the GREAT MOZILLA/FIREFOX ABYSS knows anything about their products and their continuing failures, please respond to my questions above.

I expect someone at Mozilla or a rep thereof to, for once, BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FAULTY PRODUCTS AND CUMULATIVE STRESS BURDEN AND MONEY LOST BY CUSTOMERS.

I AM LOSING MONEY AS I SPEAK, AS I DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO MY BOOKMARKS WHICH I NEED AT-THE-READY WHEN WORKING ... SO … SOMEBODY, SOMEWHERE, FIX THIS NOW!! _________ Again, not so nice, but perhaps a reader can understand my ongoing frustrations. NOTHING PERSONAL TO ANY INDIVIDUAL PERSON. I AM ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES.

GRATEFUL_DAD

[Profanity removed by moderator. Please read Mozilla Support rules and guidelines, thanks.]

Stillet af Grateful_Dad for 3 år siden

Seneste svar af guigs for 3 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Several websites have been automatically redirecting me to the Yahoo! search engine without me requesting that.

I will click on the URL for a specific website (often a Tumblr blog) and the browser will automatically redirect me to a Yahoo! search for terms related to that phrase. I… (læs mere)

I will click on the URL for a specific website (often a Tumblr blog) and the browser will automatically redirect me to a Yahoo! search for terms related to that phrase. In some cases I can click the back button and it will take me to the website I originally wanted to go to, but sometimes it doesn't even do that. It's very annoying. The most common example of this is when I attempt to visit the blog gaslightgallows.tumblr.com, which redirects me to the search screenshotted in the attached image.

Stillet af sackobooks for 5 år siden

Besvaret af jscher2000 for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Where can I complaint on Firefox extension that harm my website?

Hello I got feedback from my customers that they were no more able to access some of my websites because of a third party extension they have installed. Note: I could ins… (læs mere)

Hello

I got feedback from my customers that they were no more able to access some of my websites because of a third party extension they have installed.

Note: I could installed that extension and could confirmed that malicious activity was true.

Where can I complaint about the Firefox extension with malicious intention?

Regards

Stillet af temgo for 5 år siden

Besvaret af philipp for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Låst
  • Arkiveret

Can't find favorite add-on

I previously used an add-on that would preview a web page when hovering over the link with my cursor on the current web page. The web page would pop up and then disappear… (læs mere)

I previously used an add-on that would preview a web page when hovering over the link with my cursor on the current web page. The web page would pop up and then disappear after I removed the cursor form the popup. Can anyone tell me the name of the add-on?

Stillet af SilverMiner for 5 år siden

Besvaret af cor-el for 5 år siden

  • Låst
  • Arkiveret

could not be verified for use with firefox

Is this statement below true? If so I will be forced to use another browser. These are safe and well functioning extensions I have installed from trusted web developers. … (læs mere)

Is this statement below true? If so I will be forced to use another browser. These are safe and well functioning extensions I have installed from trusted web developers. I have trusted Firefox since, well "forever", and now limiting or even causing my extensions to stop functioning is bad. So upset about this and after all these years of having a functioning browser with the ease of making it more my own and having limited use such as with Chrome, Safari or IE is far the worst decision I have ever seen in the history of Mozilla. Hoping some feedback from others may help the developers make a better decision, and hoping Firefox can remain in the top for user-friendly experience. There are enough FREE web extensions out there to protect us all from malicious web sites and virus protection programs we all can use to keep us safe on our computers and web, why would a decision be made to limited extension security be implemented when all is working fine. Even my McAfee SiteAdvisor and Avast Online Security are showing they cannot be verified now with version 40. Ridiculous and bad for consumers who have always liked and trusted Firefox for a more user-friendly experience.


August 21, 2015

Mozilla just announced their intent to deprecate so called XUL-based add-ons in favor of what they call the WebExtensions API within the next year or two. The WebExtensions API is supposed to be mostly compatible to Chrome/Safari extension APIs.

What does this mean for XUL-based add-ons? Well, for starters, Extensions will be dead if XUL-based add-ons with XPCOM access are gone. Simple as that. The new APIs would only allow for a severely limited in functionality, severely stripped down Extensions at best.

Gone will be add-ons that e.g. let you change major bits about the Firefox user interface (e.g. tabs tree add-ons), add-ons that allow you to do more “advanced” stuff than just showing or slightly altering websites, such as e.g. restarting the browser upon click (unless mozilla kindly provides an API for that, which won’t be compatible with Chrome, of course). Add-ons like NoScript will be severely limited in their feature set as well. Say byebye to Greasemonkey and hello to Tampermonkey, with it’s limitations. Want that add-on that lets you change the new tab page for something else or enhances that page? Maybe it will be available, maybe not, depending on if and when mozilla kindly provides WebExtensions APIs for such things. And of course, depending on if there will be an author creating this entirely new add-on from scratch.

What this also means: Almost all your existing add-ons will be broken, entirely, save for some Add-on SDK add-ons, namely those that don’t do anything fancy. Sure, even today, lots of add-ons break, and some add-ons will not get updated when they do and there are no suitable replacements. However, with this change, almost every add-on will be completely broken and in need of major updating by the extension authors. Good luck with that.

It is safe to say, that Firefox will not be Firefox anymore as far as extensions go, but instead will become yet another Chrome-clone.

To be clear: I was furious when the extension signing stuff was announced and then actually implemented, which effectively created yet another Walled Garden, but regarding this announcement I am just sad. Right now, it feels like I just learned my dear old friend Firefox is going to die.

Stillet af Bungiman for 5 år siden

Seneste svar af AliceWyman for 4 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

How do I turn of the incredibly ANNOYING Smart bar?

I cannot believe Mozilla did not give the option to turn off the so called `Smart Bar`. I have no need to check my history through the address bar and the only thing it … (læs mere)

I cannot believe Mozilla did not give the option to turn off the so called `Smart Bar`. I have no need to check my history through the address bar and the only thing it does is get in the way, making it incredibly easy to click on links I no longer need to go back to. Amazing how something introduced into Firefox to uncomplicate checking your history has made browsing the web more complicated.

Stillet af Tankerton for 4 år siden

Besvaret af philipp for 4 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Office 365 error message 800478A1

While in private browsing mode in Mac OS ver 45, I can log into Office365, but when I log out and back in I get the message " Sorry, but we're having trouble signing you… (læs mere)

While in private browsing mode in Mac OS ver 45, I can log into Office365, but when I log out and back in I get the message

" Sorry, but we're having trouble signing you in

Please try again in a few minutes. If this doesn't work, you might want to contact your admin and report the following error: 800478A1."

This occurred before on a previous version of Firefox. If Firefox is not holding any information (private browsing) why can I not log back in?

Stillet af Mace2 for 4 år siden

Besvaret af Mace2 for 4 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

need help restoring tabs in firefox on mac

I have Firefox 54.0.1 on Max OS-X 10.10.5. I must have closed my Firefox window without realizing it. I was checking an email and clicked a link to a google doc, which … (læs mere)

I have Firefox 54.0.1 on Max OS-X 10.10.5. I must have closed my Firefox window without realizing it. I was checking an email and clicked a link to a google doc, which I quickly printed and then close the window. Then, when I went to go to my other firefox window, it was gone. Because I'd opened a new window (with the google doc) and closed it, not having realized I must have closed the previous window I had going rather than minimizing it, the "restore previous session" wasn't an option.

I had lots of tabs open in the window I want, and now it's a couple of windows back and I can't access it. Can you help me get those tabs back please?

Stillet af kmariesophia for 3 år siden

Besvaret af jscher2000 for 3 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Firefox 35 & 36 on Mac don't select listboxes (html select) created by javascript / jquery, unless I set focus programmatically or I right-click on it.

I am creating a single page app and newly created <select></select> does not work. It seems the problem is these select do not get focus when I click on it. I… (læs mere)

I am creating a single page app and newly created <select></select> does not work. It seems the problem is these select do not get focus when I click on it. If I (1) set focus programmatically; or, (2) rigth-click on it, it works normally. Firefox 35 / 36 on Mac OSX 10.10.2.

Stillet af floridia for 5 år siden

Besvaret af floridia for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

Why is "Check To see If Plugins Are Up To Date" web page STILL BROKEN?

When I go to "Tools" / "Plug-Ins" and click on "Check To see If Plugins Are Up To Date" it goes to Mozilla Check Your Plugin Page, but fails to show plugins or checked pl… (læs mere)

When I go to "Tools" / "Plug-Ins" and click on "Check To see If Plugins Are Up To Date" it goes to Mozilla Check Your Plugin Page, but fails to show plugins or checked plugins update status. ( https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/?utm_source=firefox-browser&utm_medium=firefox-browser&utm_campaign=plugincheck-update ) I am using OS X 10.10.3 / Firefox 37.0.1 / March-14-2015

Tried, re-installing over original, clearing cookies, clearing cache and starting in Safe Mode to no avail. Another ridiculous oversight and there's never any support for when things do go awry. Unfortunately, I have received no professional concern, with a competent cause and cure. none. And I have had and reported this problem since Firefox 35.0.

Need info and a fix, for Months Now! Thanks! Whitebuck

Still wondering why, you're losing users?

Stillet af Whitebuck for 5 år siden

Besvaret af user633449 for 5 år siden

  • Løst
  • Arkiveret

UserAgents - impact technically in Fx browser (and using with Fluid App)

Hi: I do not know what is the impact of a "user agent". I do know if I choose the iPhone user agent on my Macbook, it means I can do things that website owners/designers… (læs mere)

Hi:

I do not know what is the impact of a "user agent". I do know if I choose the iPhone user agent on my Macbook, it means I can do things that website owners/designers were trying to limit to iPhone e.g. read full version of magazines for free. So I guess a user-agent somehow tells the website owner/designer "our device" we are in someway.

But does a user-agent do anything else technically to the browser? e.g.

>Does User-Agent control if a user-script that requires xx can use xx (where xx = https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js). I can run this userscript successfully using GreaseMonkey in Fx but it fails to run in Fluid App. Fluid has userscripts embedded into the app, no plug-in is required.

>Does User-Agent control how low I can zoom. Current zoom level is restricted to 50% with below user agent. Most unhelpful.

I am wondering this as I started to play around with the purchased app, Fluid. Fluid converts a SSB (Single Site Browser) -- aka many apps that are now pure web browser but really are an app), into a quasi-app, so it can sit on your dock, use OSX notifications, use trays/split window panels etc..) Fluid is no where near as powerful as Fx, but it does have integration to OSX notifications which at the moment I cannot find an add-on that enables this via the webkit. Several add-ons are now using OSX notifications so I know it must be possible (e.g. download helper).

The latest version of Fluid is 1.8.3, which I recently purchased. By default I opened user agent and it shows this:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_3) AppleWebKit/0600.5.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) FluidApp Version/1955 Safari/0600.5.17

No idea what this user-agent is really telling me. I am on OSX yosemite 10.10.3, I use the latest FX (38 recently upgraded this week) and I do not use Safari.

Thankyou for your help.

Stillet af helpresearch for 5 år siden

Besvaret af jscher2000 for 5 år siden