Prikaz označenih pitanja: Prikaži sva pitanja
  • Riješeno

Search broken. All searches go to perplexity.ai

I want nothing to do with AI. I have unticked perplexity.ai in preferences#search but every search from the search bar and address bar goes to perplexity.ai then immedia… (pročitajte više)

I want nothing to do with AI.

I have unticked perplexity.ai in preferences#search but every search from the search bar and address bar goes to perplexity.ai then immediately crashes and displays "Internal Error".

To use DDG I have to type duckduckgo.com on the address bar then search from there.

Firefox 140.4.0 ESR.

I've' scanned the PC with malwarebytes. I restored windows from a backup image I haven't made any changes to the PC at all. Was working fine in the AM but by later afternoon, it started using perplexity.ai exclusively.

How do I get rid of perplexity.ai

Asked by citizen1138x prije 2 sedmica

Answered by citizen1138x prije 2 sedmica

  • Riješeno

Firefox updated from ESR to retail even though group policy settings disable update

I look after about 20 PCs. All Windows 10. All were running Firefox ESR ranging from 115 - 128. As I get time I update each to the latest 128.x. Using group policies I've… (pročitajte više)

I look after about 20 PCs. All Windows 10. All were running Firefox ESR ranging from 115 - 128. As I get time I update each to the latest 128.x. Using group policies I've disabled all update settings.

However, on two of the PCs, they have updated to v139.0.1. Both of the users swear they did not manually do any update. I can't figure out how they got downgraded to the retail channel.

So my question is, since 128 < 139 how can I get them back on to the ESR channel, without loosing history, bookmarks, passwords and saved logins? I gather FF's installer will detect 128 as an older version and throw an error?

ESR -> Retail to me is a downgrade. So is it possible then to upgrade back to 128.11.x?

Each PC is refreshed annually and the only backup of the profile folder I have is from the last refresh, which in most cases in 8-9 months old.

Is there any way to find out why the downgrade happened when group policy forbids it, and the user did not manually download and install the latest version?

When these downgrades happen they break things. For example, when one PC was downgraded to retail his outlook.com email no longer works. If he uses his laptop which is on 128.11.0 it works fine.

Asked by citizen1138x prije 5 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 5 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Applying security settings to all user-accounts of one PC including add-ons

Hi all, For quite a while I'm working together with others on a voluntary base (nobody gets money) as members of a computer-club, a charitable NGO and NPO (in German: ge… (pročitajte više)

Hi all,

For quite a while I'm working together with others on a voluntary base (nobody gets money) as members of a computer-club, a charitable NGO and NPO (in German: gemeinnütziger Verein) for seniors in order to bring them closer to the use of digital devices and media. It's not only teaching, but administrating the hard- and software as well.

I can remember that it was possible in former versions of Firefox to include at least a script into "defaults->prefs". I think it was user.js (not sure) in the installation folder to define common preferences to be fixed, like proxi settings. It always worked well, preventing non-privileged users from making any unwanted changes. As a I found out there must have been a very similar way to include add-ons (like uBlock Origin).

Unfortunately all content I found was older than about 10 years. When trying setting up Firefox as it is now, my test system didn't care about anything I've tried.

I'm talking about > 50 Windows-PC having in average 3 user profiles each (for teaching more than 400 members). We are amateurs regarding PC administration, except some network ex-professionals. "Baking" installation media including our needs, as I already found on Mozilla's pages, seems to be beyond our abilities as well as distributing a fitting profile (we don't have a MS-server), not speaking about Group Policies.

Is there any usable guideline for people like us? Today, each FF-installation looks different and I would like to unify this as easy as possible.

Asked by ByteRider prije 2 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 1 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Firefox is not recognizing FNC character coming from the input stream

We are allowing end user to scan 2D matrix barcode using a wedge scanner in our application. We are facing a problem where different elements of the bar code are not gett… (pročitajte više)

We are allowing end user to scan 2D matrix barcode using a wedge scanner in our application. We are facing a problem where different elements of the bar code are not getting split into the application. On investigating this further, we found that Firefox browser not recognising the FNC character(input character 29) coming from input stream (barcode scanner in this case).

Asked by Alpesh Sanghvi prije 1 mjeseci

Answered by Alpesh Sanghvi prije 1 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Cannot uninstall per-user installation of Firefox without elevating

I've been tasked with removing Firefox from all Windows workstations in our enterprise environment. Our users don't have local admin, so when they install Firefox, it is … (pročitajte više)

I've been tasked with removing Firefox from all Windows workstations in our enterprise environment. Our users don't have local admin, so when they install Firefox, it is installed in the user's profile.

I've just installed Firefox 143.0.1 in my own user profile for testing purposes. However, when I attempt to uninstall, either from Control Panel or by running %localappdata%\Mozilla Firefox\uninstall\helper.exe manually, UAC prompts for elevation, even though I installed without elevating.

I've dug in a bit more, and I found this was an issue five years ago as well:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1286070

According to that post, the issue was resolved, but it seems to have come back.

Any help would be appreciated.

Asked by Ryan Steele prije 1 mjeseci

Answered by Ryan Steele prije 1 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Deploy default profile with userChrome.css to new users

Hello, Mozilla community. I am trying to configure a Firefox ESR installation so that every new user on a computer automatically receives a visual customization (a logo … (pročitajte više)

Hello, Mozilla community.

I am trying to configure a Firefox ESR installation so that every new user on a computer automatically receives a visual customization (a logo change on about:home) through userChrome.css and userContent.css files.

My goal is to do this without using Group Policy (GPO) or logon scripts, by only modifying the files in the Firefox installation folder.

Environment:

Firefox Version: Firefox ESR 140.3.0esr

Operating System: Windows 11 Pro

Context: Standalone machine, managed without Active Directory.


My Question:

Is this method of deploying a default profile via installation files (defaults/profile or distribution.ini) still supported in recent versions of Firefox ESR?

Is there an additional step or configuration I am missing for Firefox to recognize and use the bundled profile when creating a user's first profile?

Is there any policy in policies.json that could be interfering or that is required to enable this behavior?

Thank you very much for your help and your time.

Asked by Rafael Colete prije 2 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 2 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

How to download some older versions of Firefox for 64 bit windows.

Current version of Firefox has (1) popups to get me to download a new version, (2) tab pickup, (3) popups to show article titles, (4) popups to show… (pročitajte više)

Current version of Firefox has

    (1) popups to get me to download a new version,
    (2) tab pickup,
    (3) popups to show
    article titles,
    (4) popups to show
    current URLs.

I just want to download the install programs until I get the most recent one that has none of (1) - (4).

I need to go back 1, 3, 5, 10 years?

So where on the Internet should I go to get such an old Firefox install program?

I used to really like Firefox, but changes (1) -- (2) have ruined it for me.

Asked by polluxwaite prije 2 mjeseci

Answered by James prije 2 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Remove Enterprise from Firefox

I have recently needed to update my motherboard, and the workshop put my C: and D: drives into an old second-hand motherboard they had. I have now checked Firefox - which… (pročitajte više)

I have recently needed to update my motherboard, and the workshop put my C: and D: drives into an old second-hand motherboard they had. I have now checked Firefox - which was on my C: drive, and it works with all my old bookmarks. However I seem to now be part of an 'Enterprise', which I do not want. How do I get rid of my involvement with an Enterprise within Firefox? Thanks for your help. Kanga85

Asked by ray.carman12 prije 2 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 2 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Firefox 140.2.0esr "updating" to 141.0.3 "release" channel

Recently we've began installing Firefox 140.2.0esr to our environment via the .msi file that Mozilla provides, however we're running in to a very odd incident. After app… (pročitajte više)

Recently we've began installing Firefox 140.2.0esr to our environment via the .msi file that Mozilla provides, however we're running in to a very odd incident.

After approximately 24 hours from installing Firefox esr to devices, it appears that the application is "updating" to 141.0.3 on the "release" channel. As far as I'm aware, this shouldn't be possible to begin with. But we've applied these settings via GPO:

Computer Config > Policies > Admin Templates > Mozilla > Firefox Application Autoupdate = Disabled Pin updates to a specific version = Enabled = Set to 140.2.0 Background updater = Disabled Disable Update = Enabled Manual Update Only = Enabled

After applying the GPO, confirmed this appears within the registry:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla\Firefox\ AppAutoUpdate = 0 AppUpdatePin = 140.2.0 BackgroundAppUpdate = 0 DisableAppUpdate = 1 ManualAppUpdateOnly = 1

At this point, I'm at a loss. We cannot have rapid release be what's installed in our environment. Is there something broken with 140.2.0 or are we doing something wrong here?

Asked by ZWilliams361 prije 2 mjeseci

Answered by ZWilliams361 prije 2 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

about:config -> security.pki.certificate_transparency.disable_for_spki_hashes not working as expected

Hello community :) hope everybody is doing well. I´m coming here with with asking for a help. I´m managing browsers (Google Chrome, MS Edge and Firefox) in my co… (pročitajte više)

Hello community :)

hope everybody is doing well. I´m coming here with with asking for a help.

I´m managing browsers (Google Chrome, MS Edge and Firefox) in my company via GPOs. What we´ve been dealing with since 135 version came up is having the "Did Not Connect: Potential Security Issue error page , Error insufficient cert transparency" while visiting our internal resources.

Despite of having the security.pki.certificate_transparency.disable_for_spki_hashes set up -> main three certificate hashes are correctly added, basically copying the setup from Chromium browsers , where everything works as expected , Firefox is not.

The only way how to make it work is via security.pki.certificate_transparency.disable_for_hosts , which is , of course, not desirable , because of the security risks.

Does anyone face the same issues ?

Thank you very much ya´ll

Asked by tomas.jetel prije 5 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 4 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Firefox ESR 128 --remote-debugging-port CLI option with BiDi

Until recently the Firefox docs described how to use the CDP-based Remote Agent at [this url](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html), now defunct.… (pročitajte više)

Until recently the Firefox docs described how to use the CDP-based Remote Agent at [this url](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html), now defunct. Here is the latest archive version I can find from the end of last year: https://web.archive.org/web/20241126214503/https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/remote/cdp/Usage.html

One usage example looked like this:

% firefox --remote-debugging-port DevTools listening on ws://localhost:9222/devtools/browser/7b4e84a4-597f-4839-ac6d-c9e86d16fb83

I have tried the same but get no websocket address returned:- ``` % firefox-esr Mozilla Firefox 128.11.0esr ``` ``` % firefox-esr -h ... ... --remote-debugging-port [<port>] Start the Firefox Remote Agent,

                    which is a low-level remote debugging interface used for WebDriver
                    BiDi and CDP. Defaults to port 9222.

... ... ```

`% firefox-esr --remote-debugging-port` command exits with nothing returned

I have `remote.active-protocols` set to 3 in my Firefox prefs.

Please advise how I get the Remote Agent to return a websocket address for use with BiDi with FF 128. My OS is Debian-based Linux.

TIA

Asked by keymaster prije 5 mjeseci

Answered by Henrik (work) prije 5 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

32 to 64bit ESR Migration

Hello, We are trying to automate updating Firefox ESR from 32bit to 64bit. There seems to be an issue with getting user's profiles to properly migrate for ESR. If we do … (pročitajte više)

Hello,

We are trying to automate updating Firefox ESR from 32bit to 64bit. There seems to be an issue with getting user's profiles to properly migrate for ESR. If we do a plain 32bit uninstall and 64bit installation, a new "default-esr-1" profile gets created (which is expected behavior from these Mozilla docs for new installs). But, when we set the MOZ_LEGACY_PROFILES=1 policy, this reverts to using the "default" profile instead of "default-esr" profile that was previously in use.

Are there any known ways around this which does not require user intervention to manually change back to the "default-esr" profile?

Thank you

Asked by Brian prije 6 mjeseci

Answered by Brian prije 5 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

ExtensionSettings policy

We're exploring adopting a default deny policy for Firefox extensions in our enterprise. However when I tested this by creating a custom policies.json Firefox unexpectedl… (pročitajte više)

We're exploring adopting a default deny policy for Firefox extensions in our enterprise. However when I tested this by creating a custom policies.json Firefox unexpectedly removed all extensions for me, including the ones I thought I had allow listed. Here is my policies.json but just keeping in the Facebook Container add-on to illustrate:

{

   "policies": {
       "ExtensionSettings": {
           "*": {
               "blocked_install_message": "Only approved Firefox extensions can be installed, please email your request to itdept@example.org",
               "installation_mode": "blocked",
               "allowed_types": ["theme", "dictionary", "locale"]
           },
           "@contain-facebook.xpi": { "installation_mode": "allowed" }
       }
   }

}

What I would like is to to allow pre-approved extensions (including if they already are installed) and all other types of add-on, but remove and prohibit installation of unapproved extensions.

Can anyone assist, please?

Asked by Damon prije 5 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 5 mjeseci

  • Riješeno

Enterprice policies not updating eventhough the plist file has changed.

In /Library/Preferences/org.mozilla.firefox.plist: ``` <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>EnterprisePoliciesEnabled</key> <true /> &… (pročitajte više)

In /Library/Preferences/org.mozilla.firefox.plist:

``` <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>EnterprisePoliciesEnabled</key> <true /> <key>ExtensionSettings</key> <dict> <key>cloudmetering@snowsoftware.com</key> <dict> <key>install_url</key> <string>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SnowSoftware/agent-firefox-extension/refs/heads/main/cloudmetering-v1.2.3.xpi</string> <key>installation_mode</key> <string>force_installed</string> </dict> </dict> </dict> </plist>```

In about:policies: {"cloudmetering@snowsoftware.com":{"installation_mode":"blocked","install_url":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SnowSoftware/agent-firefox-extension/refs/heads/main/cloudmetering-v1.2.3.xpi"}}

The plist file did read "blocked" at one point, but it no longer does. Why isn't firefox picking up the new value from the plist file? Restarting/refresing FF has not helped so far.

Asked by Per Malmberg prije 5 mjeseci

Answered by Per Malmberg prije 5 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Intune Joined Devices on Firefox

Hello, Our organization is attempting to implement a Conditional Access policy that restricts access to certain websites to Intune joined devices only. The error message… (pročitajte više)

Hello,

Our organization is attempting to implement a Conditional Access policy that restricts access to certain websites to Intune joined devices only. The error message mentions that I need to enable a setting from within Firefox called Windows SSO, mentioned here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/windows-sso. This setting is already enabled and I am still getting an error.

Is there anything else that could be causing this?

Asked by tallen3 prije 6 mjeseci

Answered by nullsbrawlone prije 6 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Policies.Json Can't Block A Website

Trying to block www.share365.net but it's not working { "policies": { "WebsiteFilter": { "Block": [ "*:share365.net", "*:www.share3… (pročitajte više)

Trying to block www.share365.net but it's not working

{

 "policies": {
     "WebsiteFilter": {
         "Block": [
           "*:share365.net",
           "*:www.share365.net",
           "*://share365.net/*"
         ]
     }
 }

}

Asked by aassccvv prije 9 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 9 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Intune CSP - UserMessaging Firefox Labs

We have Firefox deployed and managed through Intune/Endpoint and all works well but every device has an error with this line of the policy: UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs [./… (pročitajte više)

We have Firefox deployed and managed through Intune/Endpoint and all works well but every device has an error with this line of the policy:

UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs [./Device/Vendor/MSFT/Policy/Config/Firefox~Policy~firefox~UserMessaging/UserMessaging_FirefoxLabs] STATE Error SOURCE PROFILES Source Profile Mozilla_Firefox_Configuration ERROR CODE 0x87d1fde8

The error code is the same on all devices and is the only one present in on each device config.

Does anyone have any idea what the issue and resolution would be?

Thanks, Matt

Asked by inter-milano prije 8 mjeseci

Answered by Mike Kaply prije 7 mjeseci

  • Riješeno
  • Arhivirano

Adding an internal range to firefox intune policy management for access control

Hi All, I want to block traffic on firefox externally for managed devices via Intune, following the import of the ADMX/ADML files into intune. I have set '\Mozilla\Fire… (pročitajte više)

Hi All, I want to block traffic on firefox externally for managed devices via Intune, following the import of the ADMX/ADML files into intune.

I have set '\Mozilla\Firefox\Exceptions to blocked websites' to the following

  • //*.mydomain.com/*

which works, however, I also want to add hosts that are only resolving on IPs and not DNS. I can add specific IPs if known, but is there a way I can allow IP ranges? Ie

  • //10.10.*/* (this doesn't currently work)

Of the included screenshot, only the wildcard for mydomain.com and the specific IP currently work

If there is a better way to do this via intune for firefox only, please let me know.

Thanks

Asked by matthew89 prije 9 mjeseci

Answered by matthew89 prije 9 mjeseci